Data transformation and attribute subset selection: Do they help make differences in software failure prediction?

Hao Jia, Fengdi Shu, Ye Yang, Qi Li
{"title":"Data transformation and attribute subset selection: Do they help make differences in software failure prediction?","authors":"Hao Jia, Fengdi Shu, Ye Yang, Qi Li","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data transformation and attribute subset selection have been adopted in improving software defect/failure prediction methods. However, little consensus was achieved on their effectiveness. This paper reports a comparative study on these two kinds of techniques combined with four classifier and datasets from two projects. The results indicate that data transformation displays unobvious influence on improving the performance, while attribute subset selection methods show distinguishably inconsistent output. Besides, consistency across releases and discrepancy between the open-source and in-house maintenance projects in the evaluation of these methods are discussed.","PeriodicalId":247441,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Data transformation and attribute subset selection have been adopted in improving software defect/failure prediction methods. However, little consensus was achieved on their effectiveness. This paper reports a comparative study on these two kinds of techniques combined with four classifier and datasets from two projects. The results indicate that data transformation displays unobvious influence on improving the performance, while attribute subset selection methods show distinguishably inconsistent output. Besides, consistency across releases and discrepancy between the open-source and in-house maintenance projects in the evaluation of these methods are discussed.
数据转换和属性子集选择:它们在软件故障预测中有帮助吗?
采用数据转换和属性子集选择方法改进软件缺陷/故障预测方法。然而,对其有效性几乎没有达成共识。本文结合四个分类器和两个项目的数据集,对这两种技术进行了比较研究。结果表明,数据转换对性能的提高影响不明显,而属性子集选择方法的输出不一致性明显。此外,还讨论了这些方法在评估中的一致性以及开源和内部维护项目之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信