{"title":"ЗАМЕНИЧКЕ ПРИСВОЈНЕ КОНСТРУКЦИЈЕ У СРПСКОМ ЈЕЗИКУ: ПРАГМАТИЧКИ И СОЦИОЛИНГВИСТИЧКИ ФАКТОРИ УПОТРЕБЕ","authors":"Неда Стефановић","doi":"10.46630/phm.14.2022.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of this paper are two types of pronominal possessive constructions in Serbian language, out of which one is expressed using possessive adjectival pronoun, while the other is expressed using personal pronoun in dative (Moja drugarica je diplomirala / Drugarica mi je diplomirala). The aim of the paper was to determine the contextual influences on the speaker’s preference for one of these two constructions. Our hypothesis was that the thematization of the possessor represents one of the factors, considering the same form of dative logical subject, and that social distance / proximity represents the other factor, considering the same form of the ethical dative. A preliminary quantitative research was conducted, with Likert scale acceptability judgements, as well as a qualitative research, with a focus-group interview. The results of the quantitative questionnaire didn’t confirm the hypothesis, given that the possessive adjectival pronoun had higher rates in all of the conditions, although the rates of dative constructions were notably lower in the conditions without thematization of the possessor. The results of the focus-group interview, on the other hand, showed the speakers’ intuitions of the influence of thematization of the possessor, as well as social closeness of the possessor (when thematized) and the possessed. In addition, the interviewees mentioned the social closeness of the speaker and the listener as one of the factors, which could represent one of the reasons for the lack of the influence of forementioned factors in the quantitative section of the research. Further implications of this research apply to the interconnectedness of the case meanings, which led to the expressiveness of the dative structure, as well as to the influence of information structure on the additional meanings that can be conveyed by choosing dative possessive construction.","PeriodicalId":328718,"journal":{"name":"PHILOLOGIA MEDIANA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOLOGIA MEDIANA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46630/phm.14.2022.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The object of this paper are two types of pronominal possessive constructions in Serbian language, out of which one is expressed using possessive adjectival pronoun, while the other is expressed using personal pronoun in dative (Moja drugarica je diplomirala / Drugarica mi je diplomirala). The aim of the paper was to determine the contextual influences on the speaker’s preference for one of these two constructions. Our hypothesis was that the thematization of the possessor represents one of the factors, considering the same form of dative logical subject, and that social distance / proximity represents the other factor, considering the same form of the ethical dative. A preliminary quantitative research was conducted, with Likert scale acceptability judgements, as well as a qualitative research, with a focus-group interview. The results of the quantitative questionnaire didn’t confirm the hypothesis, given that the possessive adjectival pronoun had higher rates in all of the conditions, although the rates of dative constructions were notably lower in the conditions without thematization of the possessor. The results of the focus-group interview, on the other hand, showed the speakers’ intuitions of the influence of thematization of the possessor, as well as social closeness of the possessor (when thematized) and the possessed. In addition, the interviewees mentioned the social closeness of the speaker and the listener as one of the factors, which could represent one of the reasons for the lack of the influence of forementioned factors in the quantitative section of the research. Further implications of this research apply to the interconnectedness of the case meanings, which led to the expressiveness of the dative structure, as well as to the influence of information structure on the additional meanings that can be conveyed by choosing dative possessive construction.
本文的研究对象是塞尔维亚语中两种代词所有格结构,其中一种是用所有格形容词代词表示,另一种是用格人称代词表示(Moja drugarica je diplomirala / drugarica mi je diplomirala)。本文的目的是确定语境对说话人对这两种结构之一的偏好的影响。我们的假设是,考虑到相同形式的与格逻辑主体,占有人的主题化代表一个因素,而考虑到相同形式的伦理与格,社会距离/接近代表另一个因素。我们进行了初步的定量研究,采用李克特量表进行可接受性判断,并进行了定性研究,采用焦点小组访谈。定量问卷的结果并没有证实这一假设,因为所有格形容词代词在所有条件下都有更高的比率,尽管在没有主格化的条件下,加格结构的比率明显较低。另一方面,焦点小组访谈的结果显示了说话者对主位化的影响的直觉,以及主位化时的主位化与被主位化的社会亲密度。此外,受访者提到说话者和听话者的社会亲密度是其中一个因素,这可能是研究中定量部分缺乏上述因素影响的原因之一。本研究的进一步启示适用于格意义的相互联系,这导致了与格结构的表达性,以及信息结构对选择与格所有格结构所能传达的附加意义的影响。