Measurement of Caval Aorta Diameter Index by Transthoracic Echocardiogram in Normal Indian Population

S. Sompura, V. Sangareddi, N. Swaminathan
{"title":"Measurement of Caval Aorta Diameter Index by Transthoracic Echocardiogram in Normal Indian Population","authors":"S. Sompura, V. Sangareddi, N. Swaminathan","doi":"10.4103/jiae.jiae_24_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bedside ultrasonography is a promising noninvasive and rapid technique to assess body fluid status. Early detection of hypovolemia and hypervolemia is crucial to guide management in critically ill patients. There is a considerable demographic variability in the normal range of inferior vena cava dimensions as seen in numerous studies and a steadfast formula to calculate caval diameter based on demographic parameters and body growth is not available till date. Caval aorta diameter index had a positive correlation with invasively measured central venous pressure as established by previous studies done in intensive care units. The simplicity of examination technique makes this index useful in every situation where body fluid status has therapeutic and prognostic implications. This study aims to identify standard normal measurement of caval aorta index by easily available two-dimensional echocardiography in subcostal view and by right coronal approach/transhepatic view in different age groups in Indian patients. Materials and Methods: One hundred and two patients referred for routine cardiac status evaluation who were asymptomatic and clinically normal without any major medical illness with normal echocardiogram were prospectively analyzed and caval aorta index assessed in both subxiphoid and transhepatic right coronal view. Results: Normal caval aorta index measured in subcostal view was 1.108 ± 0.076 and measured in transhepatic view was 1.101 ± 0.082 (mean ± 2 standard deviation). The difference of caval aorta index measured in both views was not significant statistically (P = 0.207). Conclusion: In this study, we provide a normal reference level for sonographic caval aorta index in Indian population measured in subxiphoid and transhepatic views. We also conclude that transhepatic right coronal view measurements for this index are comparable to subcostal view, so both views can be used alternatively when one window is suboptimal.","PeriodicalId":325663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Indian Academy of Echocardiography & Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Indian Academy of Echocardiography & Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jiae.jiae_24_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bedside ultrasonography is a promising noninvasive and rapid technique to assess body fluid status. Early detection of hypovolemia and hypervolemia is crucial to guide management in critically ill patients. There is a considerable demographic variability in the normal range of inferior vena cava dimensions as seen in numerous studies and a steadfast formula to calculate caval diameter based on demographic parameters and body growth is not available till date. Caval aorta diameter index had a positive correlation with invasively measured central venous pressure as established by previous studies done in intensive care units. The simplicity of examination technique makes this index useful in every situation where body fluid status has therapeutic and prognostic implications. This study aims to identify standard normal measurement of caval aorta index by easily available two-dimensional echocardiography in subcostal view and by right coronal approach/transhepatic view in different age groups in Indian patients. Materials and Methods: One hundred and two patients referred for routine cardiac status evaluation who were asymptomatic and clinically normal without any major medical illness with normal echocardiogram were prospectively analyzed and caval aorta index assessed in both subxiphoid and transhepatic right coronal view. Results: Normal caval aorta index measured in subcostal view was 1.108 ± 0.076 and measured in transhepatic view was 1.101 ± 0.082 (mean ± 2 standard deviation). The difference of caval aorta index measured in both views was not significant statistically (P = 0.207). Conclusion: In this study, we provide a normal reference level for sonographic caval aorta index in Indian population measured in subxiphoid and transhepatic views. We also conclude that transhepatic right coronal view measurements for this index are comparable to subcostal view, so both views can be used alternatively when one window is suboptimal.
正常印第安人经胸超声心动图测量腹主动脉直径指数
背景:床边超声检查是一种很有前途的无创、快速的体液状态评估技术。早期发现低血容量和高血容量对指导危重患者的治疗至关重要。在大量研究中发现,下腔静脉尺寸的正常范围存在相当大的人口统计学差异,迄今为止还没有一个基于人口统计学参数和身体生长来计算腔静脉直径的可靠公式。先前在重症监护病房进行的研究证实,下腔主动脉直径指数与有创测量的中心静脉压呈正相关。检查技术的简单性使得该指标在体液状态具有治疗和预后意义的任何情况下都有用。本研究旨在确定不同年龄组印度患者肋下位和右冠状位/经肝位二维超声心动图对腔动脉指数的标准正常测量。材料与方法:对102例无临床症状、无重大内科疾病、超声心动图正常、临床正常的患者进行前瞻性分析,并在剑突下和经肝右冠状位上评估腔动脉指数。结果:肋下位正常腔动脉指数为1.108±0.076,经肝位正常腔动脉指数为1.101±0.082(平均值±2标准差)。两视图下腔主动脉指数差异无统计学意义(P = 0.207)。结论:在本研究中,我们提供了一个正常的参考水平超声下腔主动脉指数测量在印度人口剑突下和经肝位。我们还得出结论,经肝右冠状位测量该指标与肋下位测量相当,因此当一个窗口不理想时,两种视图都可以交替使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信