Statistical Analysis of Rebound Hammer Assessment on Reinforced Concrete Buildings

A. D., A. O, Arum C., Alabi S. A.
{"title":"Statistical Analysis of Rebound Hammer Assessment on Reinforced Concrete Buildings","authors":"A. D., A. O, Arum C., Alabi S. A.","doi":"10.1109/SEB-SDG57117.2023.10124607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research explores the use of non-destructive equipment (Schmidt Rebound Hammer) to investigate the state of reinforced concrete buildings. A total of 138 Slabs, 266 Beams and 210 Columns were assessed as structural elements spread across six (6) different buildings. The columns, beams and slabs for the residential buildings have overall mean rebound compressive strength of 26.15 N/ mm2 20.18 N/ mm2 and 32.2 N/mm2 respectively. For the institutional buildings, the overall average rebound compressive strength for the columns, beams and slabs is 25.71 $N$/ mm2, 27.22 N/mm2 and 34.92 N/mm2 respectively. The columns, beams and slabs for the industrial buildings have overall mean rebound compressive strength of 30.27N/mm2, 24.23N/mm2 and 39.87N/ mm2 respectively. Rebound compressive strength values reduce as the height of the building increases. The standard deviation and coefficient of variance for a set of structural elements in the buildings showed high level of uncertainties and disparities which is an established factor in the use of the rebound hammer. This is a clear indication that a more robust method of analysis is needed for the interpretation and drawing of conclusions from the rebound hammer assessment.","PeriodicalId":185729,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Science, Engineering and Business for Sustainable Development Goals (SEB-SDG)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Science, Engineering and Business for Sustainable Development Goals (SEB-SDG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEB-SDG57117.2023.10124607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research explores the use of non-destructive equipment (Schmidt Rebound Hammer) to investigate the state of reinforced concrete buildings. A total of 138 Slabs, 266 Beams and 210 Columns were assessed as structural elements spread across six (6) different buildings. The columns, beams and slabs for the residential buildings have overall mean rebound compressive strength of 26.15 N/ mm2 20.18 N/ mm2 and 32.2 N/mm2 respectively. For the institutional buildings, the overall average rebound compressive strength for the columns, beams and slabs is 25.71 $N$/ mm2, 27.22 N/mm2 and 34.92 N/mm2 respectively. The columns, beams and slabs for the industrial buildings have overall mean rebound compressive strength of 30.27N/mm2, 24.23N/mm2 and 39.87N/ mm2 respectively. Rebound compressive strength values reduce as the height of the building increases. The standard deviation and coefficient of variance for a set of structural elements in the buildings showed high level of uncertainties and disparities which is an established factor in the use of the rebound hammer. This is a clear indication that a more robust method of analysis is needed for the interpretation and drawing of conclusions from the rebound hammer assessment.
钢筋混凝土建筑回弹锤评价的统计分析
本研究探索使用非破坏性设备(施密特回弹锤)来调查钢筋混凝土建筑的状态。共有138块板、266根梁和210根柱被评估为分布在六(6)座不同建筑中的结构元素。住宅柱、梁、板整体平均回弹抗压强度分别为26.15 N/mm2、20.18 N/mm2和32.2 N/mm2。机构建筑柱、梁、板的整体平均回弹抗压强度分别为25.71 N$/ mm2、27.22 N/mm2和34.92 N/mm2。工业建筑柱、梁、板的整体平均回弹抗压强度分别为30.27N/mm2、24.23N/mm2和39.87N/ mm2。回弹抗压强度值随着建筑物高度的增加而减小。建筑物中一组结构构件的标准差和方差系数显示出高度的不确定性和差异,这是使用回弹锤的既定因素。这清楚地表明,需要一种更可靠的分析方法来解释和从反弹锤评估中得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信