Chapter 6. A Hybrid Mega-Course with Optional Studio: Responding Responsibly to an Administrative Mandate

Christina J. Santana, S. Rose, Robert LaBarge
{"title":"Chapter 6. A Hybrid Mega-Course with Optional Studio: Responding Responsibly to an Administrative Mandate","authors":"Christina J. Santana, S. Rose, Robert LaBarge","doi":"10.37514/per-b.2018.0179.2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What can ethically-minded writing instructors do when their administration mandates innovation at the level of delivery mode? This essay offers a responsible response to this question. It provides data and observations from the study of a two-semester, small-scale first-year composition (FYC) studio pilot program at the Tempe campus of Arizona State University (ASU). Studio courses for the pilot were populated by approximately 50 students per section. These mega-courses were both hybrid, requiring students to complete weekly asynchronous online assignments, and attached to optional Studios that students could choose to attend. This chapter details the design of this ASU program; investigates how problems with large composition class sizes can be mitigated by smaller, optional Studios taught by the same team of instructors who shared a curriculum; and explores the consequences of giving students the choice to attend Studios in the face of the truism that “academically optional” can mean “not important” in the minds of first-year students. Although our pilot program did not continue beyond two semesters, it did succeed in shedding light on the intersection of self-placement and required attendance in the context of studio courses and FYC.","PeriodicalId":375134,"journal":{"name":"The Writing Studio Sampler: Stories About Change","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Writing Studio Sampler: Stories About Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/per-b.2018.0179.2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What can ethically-minded writing instructors do when their administration mandates innovation at the level of delivery mode? This essay offers a responsible response to this question. It provides data and observations from the study of a two-semester, small-scale first-year composition (FYC) studio pilot program at the Tempe campus of Arizona State University (ASU). Studio courses for the pilot were populated by approximately 50 students per section. These mega-courses were both hybrid, requiring students to complete weekly asynchronous online assignments, and attached to optional Studios that students could choose to attend. This chapter details the design of this ASU program; investigates how problems with large composition class sizes can be mitigated by smaller, optional Studios taught by the same team of instructors who shared a curriculum; and explores the consequences of giving students the choice to attend Studios in the face of the truism that “academically optional” can mean “not important” in the minds of first-year students. Although our pilot program did not continue beyond two semesters, it did succeed in shedding light on the intersection of self-placement and required attendance in the context of studio courses and FYC.
第六章。一个带有可选工作室的混合大型课程:负责地响应行政命令
当行政部门要求在教学模式层面进行创新时,具有道德意识的写作教师能做些什么?本文对这个问题给出了一个负责任的回答。它提供了来自亚利桑那州立大学坦佩校区一个为期两个学期的小型一年级作文(FYC)工作室试点项目的研究数据和观察结果。该试点项目的工作室课程每节大约有50名学生。这些大型课程都是混合式的,要求学生每周完成异步在线作业,并附带学生可以选择参加的可选工作室。本章详细介绍了该ASU程序的设计;研究了如何通过由共享课程的教师团队教授的较小的、可选的工作室来缓解大型作文班级的问题;并探讨了让学生选择参加工作室的后果,面对“学术选修”在一年级学生心目中可能意味着“不重要”的真理。虽然我们的试点项目没有持续超过两个学期,但它确实成功地阐明了在工作室课程和FYC背景下自我安置和出勤要求的交叉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信