Do Industrial Incidents in the Chemical Sector Create Equity Market Contagion?

G. Brown, S. Corbet, Caroline McMullan (née Keown), Ruchira Sharma
{"title":"Do Industrial Incidents in the Chemical Sector Create Equity Market Contagion?","authors":"G. Brown, S. Corbet, Caroline McMullan (née Keown), Ruchira Sharma","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2447629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThis paper examines a number of US chemical industry incidents and their effect on equity prices of the incident company. Furthermore, this paper then examines the contagion effect of this incident on direct competitors.\n\n\nMETHOD\nEvent study methodology is used to assess the impact of chemical incidents on both incident and competitor companies.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThis paper finds that the incident company experiences deeper negative abnormal returns as the number of injuries and fatalities as a result of the incident increases. The equity value of the competitor companies suffer substantial losses stemming from contagion effects when disasters that occur cause ten or more injuries and fatalities, but benefit from the incident through increasing equity value when the level of injury and fatality is minor.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPresence of contagion suggests collective action may reduce value destruction brought about by safety incidents that result in significant injury or loss of life.\n\n\nPRACTICAL APPLICATIONS\nThis research can be used as a resource to promote and justify the cost of safety mechanisms within the chemical industry, as incidents have been shown to negatively affect the equity value of the not just the incident company, but also their direct competitors.","PeriodicalId":340493,"journal":{"name":"Pollution eJournal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pollution eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2447629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

INTRODUCTION This paper examines a number of US chemical industry incidents and their effect on equity prices of the incident company. Furthermore, this paper then examines the contagion effect of this incident on direct competitors. METHOD Event study methodology is used to assess the impact of chemical incidents on both incident and competitor companies. RESULTS This paper finds that the incident company experiences deeper negative abnormal returns as the number of injuries and fatalities as a result of the incident increases. The equity value of the competitor companies suffer substantial losses stemming from contagion effects when disasters that occur cause ten or more injuries and fatalities, but benefit from the incident through increasing equity value when the level of injury and fatality is minor. CONCLUSIONS Presence of contagion suggests collective action may reduce value destruction brought about by safety incidents that result in significant injury or loss of life. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS This research can be used as a resource to promote and justify the cost of safety mechanisms within the chemical industry, as incidents have been shown to negatively affect the equity value of the not just the incident company, but also their direct competitors.
化工行业的工业事故是否会造成股市传染?
本文考察了美国化工行业的一些事件及其对事件公司股价的影响。此外,本文还考察了这一事件对直接竞争对手的传染效应。方法采用事件研究方法来评估化学品事故对事故和竞争对手公司的影响。结果随着事故伤亡人数的增加,事故公司的负异常收益越深。当灾难造成10人或以上伤亡时,竞争对手公司的股权价值因传染效应而遭受重大损失,但当伤亡程度较轻时,竞争对手公司的股权价值通过增加而受益。结论传染性的存在表明,集体行动可以减少因安全事故造成的重大人身伤害或生命损失所带来的价值破坏。实际应用本研究可以作为一种资源来促进和证明化学工业内安全机制的成本,因为事件已被证明不仅对事件公司的股权价值产生负面影响,而且对其直接竞争对手的股权价值也产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信