Posthuman ethics

I. Privalova
{"title":"Posthuman ethics","authors":"I. Privalova","doi":"10.24151/2409-1073-2021-4-99-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The content of posthuman ethics is clarified through a comparative analysis of the psychophysical structure of modern man and posthuman, the features of which specifically determine the ethics of different types of society. For this purpose, the content of the concepts mind, consciousness, soul, spirit, human cognition is investigated from the point of view of modern neuroscience, Christian anthropology and Cartesian philosophy. The questions of free will are raised, arguments are given in favor of the concept of compatibilism.","PeriodicalId":253073,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Socio-Humanitarian Studies","volume":"332 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Socio-Humanitarian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2021-4-99-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The content of posthuman ethics is clarified through a comparative analysis of the psychophysical structure of modern man and posthuman, the features of which specifically determine the ethics of different types of society. For this purpose, the content of the concepts mind, consciousness, soul, spirit, human cognition is investigated from the point of view of modern neuroscience, Christian anthropology and Cartesian philosophy. The questions of free will are raised, arguments are given in favor of the concept of compatibilism.
通过对现代人与后人类的心理生理结构的比较分析,明确了后人类伦理的内容,其特征具体决定了不同类型社会的伦理。为此,从现代神经科学、基督教人类学和笛卡尔哲学的角度考察了心灵、意识、灵魂、精神、人类认知等概念的内容。人们提出了自由意志的问题,并提出了支持相容论的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信