‘For Richer, For Poorer’

Lise Butler
{"title":"‘For Richer, For Poorer’","authors":"Lise Butler","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198862895.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 examines an unpublished policy document that Young submitted to the Labour Party Policy Committee in 1952 called ‘For Richer, For Poorer’, which marked a transition from Young’s public policy career towards sociology and social research. Young left his position in the Labour Party Research Department after the Conservative election victory in the 1951 general election, and undertook a Ph.D. in social administration at the London School of Economics supervised by the social policy thinker Richard Titmuss. Responding to the Labour Party’s failure to appeal to women voters in the 1951 election, ‘For Richer, For Poorer’ urged the Labour Party to pay more attention to family policy. Young integrated a historical vision of declining social cohesion caused by industrialization and suburbanization with contemporary concerns about the poverty of women and children that built on the work of earlier social poverty researchers and the feminist campaigns for a family allowance led by Eleanor Rathbone. This document reflected a turn in Young’s thought away from the focus on full employment and macro-economic planning which had characterized much of his policy work during the Attlee government, and towards thinking about social policy from the perspective of those he conceived of as non-workers, including the elderly, the unemployed, children, and women.","PeriodicalId":202171,"journal":{"name":"Michael Young, Social Science, and the British Left, 1945-1970","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michael Young, Social Science, and the British Left, 1945-1970","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198862895.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 3 examines an unpublished policy document that Young submitted to the Labour Party Policy Committee in 1952 called ‘For Richer, For Poorer’, which marked a transition from Young’s public policy career towards sociology and social research. Young left his position in the Labour Party Research Department after the Conservative election victory in the 1951 general election, and undertook a Ph.D. in social administration at the London School of Economics supervised by the social policy thinker Richard Titmuss. Responding to the Labour Party’s failure to appeal to women voters in the 1951 election, ‘For Richer, For Poorer’ urged the Labour Party to pay more attention to family policy. Young integrated a historical vision of declining social cohesion caused by industrialization and suburbanization with contemporary concerns about the poverty of women and children that built on the work of earlier social poverty researchers and the feminist campaigns for a family allowance led by Eleanor Rathbone. This document reflected a turn in Young’s thought away from the focus on full employment and macro-economic planning which had characterized much of his policy work during the Attlee government, and towards thinking about social policy from the perspective of those he conceived of as non-workers, including the elderly, the unemployed, children, and women.
“富人也好,穷人也罢”
第三章考察了杨在1952年提交给工党政策委员会的一份未发表的政策文件,该文件名为《为了富人,为了穷人》,它标志着杨的公共政策生涯向社会学和社会研究的过渡。1951年大选保守党获胜后,杨离开了工党研究部的职位,在伦敦经济学院攻读社会管理博士学位,导师是社会政策思想家理查德·蒂特马斯。在1951年的选举中,工党未能吸引女性选民,作为回应,《无论贫富》敦促工党更多地关注家庭政策。杨将工业化和郊郊化导致的社会凝聚力下降的历史观点与当代对妇女和儿童贫困的关注结合起来,这种关注建立在早期社会贫困研究人员的工作和埃莉诺·拉斯伯恩(Eleanor Rathbone)领导的争取家庭补贴的女权主义运动的基础上。这份文件反映了杨思想的转变,他不再把重点放在充分就业和宏观经济计划上,这是他在艾德礼政府期间的政策工作的特点,而是从他所认为的非工人的角度来思考社会政策,包括老人、失业者、儿童和妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信