Decision-making

P. d’Iribarne, Sylvie Chevrier, Alain Henry, J. Segal, Geneviève Tréguer-Felten
{"title":"Decision-making","authors":"P. d’Iribarne, Sylvie Chevrier, Alain Henry, J. Segal, Geneviève Tréguer-Felten","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198857471.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making decisions involves many risks such as ignoring relevant points of view; angering those who are frustrated, inducing them, once the decision has been made, to hinder its implementation. One way to limit these risks is to frame decisions with rituals. However, for a ritual to work, it must appear respectable; and this relies on an eminently cultural interpretation. To understand what is at stake, two aspects of the decision-making process are explored successively. First, a Franco-Dutch case demonstrates how social interactions intervene in the idea selection. Second, examples from Cameroon and Jordan show the suspicions and resentment that any decision is likely to generate among those who suffer from it. However, appropriate procedures are likely to overcome suspicions and to give a sense of fairness.","PeriodicalId":210634,"journal":{"name":"Cross-Cultural Management Revisited","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross-Cultural Management Revisited","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857471.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Making decisions involves many risks such as ignoring relevant points of view; angering those who are frustrated, inducing them, once the decision has been made, to hinder its implementation. One way to limit these risks is to frame decisions with rituals. However, for a ritual to work, it must appear respectable; and this relies on an eminently cultural interpretation. To understand what is at stake, two aspects of the decision-making process are explored successively. First, a Franco-Dutch case demonstrates how social interactions intervene in the idea selection. Second, examples from Cameroon and Jordan show the suspicions and resentment that any decision is likely to generate among those who suffer from it. However, appropriate procedures are likely to overcome suspicions and to give a sense of fairness.
决策
做决定有很多风险,比如忽视相关观点;激怒那些沮丧的人,诱使他们,一旦做出决定,阻碍其实施。限制这些风险的一种方法是用惯例来制定决策。然而,要使仪式起作用,它必须看起来令人尊敬;这依赖于一种显著的文化解释。为了了解什么是利害攸关的,我们依次探讨了决策过程的两个方面。首先,一个法国和荷兰的案例展示了社会互动是如何干预想法选择的。其次,喀麦隆和约旦的例子表明,任何决定都可能在受其影响的人群中引发怀疑和怨恨。然而,适当的程序可能会消除怀疑,并给人一种公平的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信