Mitigative tactics in digital diplomatic discourse (based on the speeches of S. Lavrov and B. Johnson)

S. Takhtarova, D. Abuzyarova, V. Mityagina
{"title":"Mitigative tactics in digital diplomatic discourse (based on the speeches of S. Lavrov and B. Johnson)","authors":"S. Takhtarova, D. Abuzyarova, V. Mityagina","doi":"10.1145/3388984.3389066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses tactics that implement communicative mitigation in digital diplomatic discourse. The active development of digital communication formats could not but affect institutional discursive practices, including diplomatic discourse. This is confirmed not only by the official websites of diplomatic services, but also by personal and institutional accounts of politicians and diplomats on social networks, which, in turn, led to the emergence of terms such as digital diplomacy and twi(t)plomacy. Based on the main characteristics of diplomatic discourse, such as semantic diffused, tolerance, evasiveness in statements, focus on the non-conflict course of communicative contact, the article concludes that the communicative mitigation is relevant for this type of discourse. As an analysis of the websites of the diplomatic departments of Russia and the UK showed, communicative mitigation plays an important role in digital diplomatic communication. As a result of the analysis of the speeches of S. Lavrov and B. Johnson, it was found that the most actively mitigative strategies and tactics are used to mitigate appraisal illocution. The institutional nature of diplomatic communication, which is characterized by a high level of stereotypical and ritualistic diplomatic language, is also determined by the fact that mitigative tactics are characterized by a fairly high cliché in both languages, Russian and English.","PeriodicalId":288007,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3388984.3389066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article discusses tactics that implement communicative mitigation in digital diplomatic discourse. The active development of digital communication formats could not but affect institutional discursive practices, including diplomatic discourse. This is confirmed not only by the official websites of diplomatic services, but also by personal and institutional accounts of politicians and diplomats on social networks, which, in turn, led to the emergence of terms such as digital diplomacy and twi(t)plomacy. Based on the main characteristics of diplomatic discourse, such as semantic diffused, tolerance, evasiveness in statements, focus on the non-conflict course of communicative contact, the article concludes that the communicative mitigation is relevant for this type of discourse. As an analysis of the websites of the diplomatic departments of Russia and the UK showed, communicative mitigation plays an important role in digital diplomatic communication. As a result of the analysis of the speeches of S. Lavrov and B. Johnson, it was found that the most actively mitigative strategies and tactics are used to mitigate appraisal illocution. The institutional nature of diplomatic communication, which is characterized by a high level of stereotypical and ritualistic diplomatic language, is also determined by the fact that mitigative tactics are characterized by a fairly high cliché in both languages, Russian and English.
数字外交话语中的缓和策略(基于S. Lavrov和B. Johnson的演讲)
本文讨论了在数字外交话语中实施交际缓和的策略。数字传播格式的积极发展不能不影响制度话语实践,包括外交话语。这不仅得到了外交部门官方网站的证实,也得到了政治家和外交官在社交网络上的个人和机构账户的证实,这反过来又导致了数字外交和双(t)外交等术语的出现。本文从外交语篇的语义扩散性、容忍性、含糊其辞等主要特征出发,以交际接触的非冲突过程为重点,得出交际缓和与外交语篇的关系。对俄罗斯和英国外交部门网站的分析表明,通信缓解在数字外交通信中发挥着重要作用。通过对拉夫罗夫和约翰逊演讲的分析,我们发现最积极的缓解策略和战术是用来缓解评价语用的。外交交际的制度性质,其特点是高度的刻板和仪式性的外交语言,也决定了这一事实,即缓和策略的特点是相当高的陈词滥调在两种语言,俄语和英语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信