Fundamental Analysis VS Technical analysis: The Comparison of Two Analysis in Malaysia Stock Market

Shaharudin Jakpar, Michael Tinggi, Akmal Hisham Tak, Wen Yi Chong
{"title":"Fundamental Analysis VS Technical analysis: The Comparison of Two Analysis in Malaysia Stock Market","authors":"Shaharudin Jakpar, Michael Tinggi, Akmal Hisham Tak, Wen Yi Chong","doi":"10.33736/URAF.1208.2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is conducted to analyse the credibility of the fundamental analysis and technical analysis on predicting the stock return and compare both models to determine which model is more credible to be used as a good trading strategy by investors. The study is based on 80 companies selected from Bursa Malaysia in the food manufacturing industry in the main market from the year of 2012 to 2016. The stock return is used to measure whether both analyses are able to forecast and generate the positive return. Net profit margin, price earnings ratio and total asset turnover are used as fundamental indicators while moving average convergence divergence is used as technical analysis indicators. In order to test the significance of both model on stock return, panel regression models are applied in this study. The result shows that although both model can be used to generate positive return, technical analysis did not outperform fundamental analysis in the food manufacturing industry in Bursa Malaysia.","PeriodicalId":187805,"journal":{"name":"UNIMAS Review of Accounting and Finance","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNIMAS Review of Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33736/URAF.1208.2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This study is conducted to analyse the credibility of the fundamental analysis and technical analysis on predicting the stock return and compare both models to determine which model is more credible to be used as a good trading strategy by investors. The study is based on 80 companies selected from Bursa Malaysia in the food manufacturing industry in the main market from the year of 2012 to 2016. The stock return is used to measure whether both analyses are able to forecast and generate the positive return. Net profit margin, price earnings ratio and total asset turnover are used as fundamental indicators while moving average convergence divergence is used as technical analysis indicators. In order to test the significance of both model on stock return, panel regression models are applied in this study. The result shows that although both model can be used to generate positive return, technical analysis did not outperform fundamental analysis in the food manufacturing industry in Bursa Malaysia.
基本分析与技术分析:两种分析在马来西亚股市的比较
本研究旨在分析基本面分析和技术分析在预测股票收益方面的可信度,并对两种模型进行比较,以确定哪种模型更可信,更适合投资者作为一种良好的交易策略。该研究基于从马来西亚证券交易所(Bursa Malaysia)选出的2012年至2016年主要市场食品制造业的80家公司。股票收益用于衡量两种分析是否能够预测并产生正收益。净利润率、市盈率和总资产周转率作为基本指标,移动平均收敛发散作为技术分析指标。为了检验两种模型对股票收益的显著性,本研究采用面板回归模型。结果表明,虽然这两个模型都可以用来产生正回报,技术分析并没有优于基本面分析在马来西亚证券交易所的食品制造业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信