Reducing Operational Cost and Accelerating Oil in a Thermal Field with Cyclic Steam Stimulation Operation in South Oman

Khalfan Mahrazy, A. Alwazeer, Khalid Salhi
{"title":"Reducing Operational Cost and Accelerating Oil in a Thermal Field with Cyclic Steam Stimulation Operation in South Oman","authors":"Khalfan Mahrazy, A. Alwazeer, Khalid Salhi","doi":"10.2118/193372-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Thermal recovery is becoming a main stream enhanced recovery method for heavy oil with unique challenges. The extreme nature of thermal recovery requires flexible and creative approach to address the unique challenges. One of the accepted recovery thermal methods is Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS). The thermal cycle starts with injection phase followed by soaking, and finally, production phase. Conversion from injection phase to production phase is considered a significant operational risk in addition to typical risks associated with oil production operations. The additional risk during the conversion to production from an injection cycle is due to the significant energy placement in the reservoir during steaming. If not controlled, high energy hydrocarbon fluids flowing back to surface can lead to loss of containment and harm to life or the environment.\n Beam Pumps have been used predominantly in conjunction with insert down-hole pump and sucker rods. During injection phase, the well is operated as an injector without pumps or rods, and when the time comes to convert to a producer, rods and insert pumps are reinstalled. This conversion step from injector to producer is highest risk in the CSS well operation cycle.\n After the injection cycle is completed, a significant energy is placed into the reservoir, the well is shut in for soaking period which is 1-3 days. Free flow is required after the shut in period to depressurize the well. Depressurization period extends in some cases to many weeks and would require killing the well where it's common that a well would not die off just by depressurization alone resulting in significant wait time. The amount of flow back and energy stored in the well is directly proportional to steam injection pressure and duration.\n In many cases where well still retain some energy and pressure is still high for intervention, due to free flowing not subsiding, killing the well is utilized. Well killing procedures pose another set of challenges such as; pump start up challenges due to viscosity reduction, cost for brine mix and wrong pressure estimation leading to prolong interventions.\n The challenges in CSS opened an opportunity for innovation where thermal wells could be attended for conversion with minimum rods taken out or rods added back in under high temperature and pressure. The new concept is a combination of dual rod Blow Out Preventer (BOP) and stripper seals set in series. A trial in November 2017 was conducted with positive results where the advantages of this innovation were clearly demonstrated. This paper is a summary of the design approach and the successful trial proving the concept.","PeriodicalId":225138,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, November 29, 2018","volume":"483 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, November 29, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193372-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Thermal recovery is becoming a main stream enhanced recovery method for heavy oil with unique challenges. The extreme nature of thermal recovery requires flexible and creative approach to address the unique challenges. One of the accepted recovery thermal methods is Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS). The thermal cycle starts with injection phase followed by soaking, and finally, production phase. Conversion from injection phase to production phase is considered a significant operational risk in addition to typical risks associated with oil production operations. The additional risk during the conversion to production from an injection cycle is due to the significant energy placement in the reservoir during steaming. If not controlled, high energy hydrocarbon fluids flowing back to surface can lead to loss of containment and harm to life or the environment. Beam Pumps have been used predominantly in conjunction with insert down-hole pump and sucker rods. During injection phase, the well is operated as an injector without pumps or rods, and when the time comes to convert to a producer, rods and insert pumps are reinstalled. This conversion step from injector to producer is highest risk in the CSS well operation cycle. After the injection cycle is completed, a significant energy is placed into the reservoir, the well is shut in for soaking period which is 1-3 days. Free flow is required after the shut in period to depressurize the well. Depressurization period extends in some cases to many weeks and would require killing the well where it's common that a well would not die off just by depressurization alone resulting in significant wait time. The amount of flow back and energy stored in the well is directly proportional to steam injection pressure and duration. In many cases where well still retain some energy and pressure is still high for intervention, due to free flowing not subsiding, killing the well is utilized. Well killing procedures pose another set of challenges such as; pump start up challenges due to viscosity reduction, cost for brine mix and wrong pressure estimation leading to prolong interventions. The challenges in CSS opened an opportunity for innovation where thermal wells could be attended for conversion with minimum rods taken out or rods added back in under high temperature and pressure. The new concept is a combination of dual rod Blow Out Preventer (BOP) and stripper seals set in series. A trial in November 2017 was conducted with positive results where the advantages of this innovation were clearly demonstrated. This paper is a summary of the design approach and the successful trial proving the concept.
南阿曼油田采用循环蒸汽增产作业,降低了作业成本,加快了采油速度
热采正成为稠油采收率的主流方法,但也面临着独特的挑战。热采的极端性质需要灵活和创造性的方法来解决独特的挑战。循环蒸汽增产(CSS)是公认的采热方法之一。热循环从注入阶段开始,接着是浸泡阶段,最后是生产阶段。除了与石油生产作业相关的典型风险外,从注入阶段到生产阶段的转换被认为是一个重大的操作风险。在从注入循环转化为生产的过程中,额外的风险是由于蒸汽过程中大量的能量放置在储层中。如果不加以控制,高能量烃类流体会回流到地面,导致泄漏,对生命和环境造成危害。梁式泵主要与插入式井下泵和抽油杆配合使用。在注入阶段,该井作为注入器运行,没有泵或抽油杆,当转换为生产设备时,需要重新安装抽油杆和插入泵。在CSS井作业周期中,从注入器到采油器的这一转换步骤是风险最高的。注入周期完成后,大量能量注入储层,井被关井浸泡1-3天。关井后需要自由流动来给井减压。在某些情况下,降压周期延长至数周,并且需要压井,而通常情况下,仅通过降压不会导致井死亡,因此需要大量等待时间。返流量和储存在井中的能量与注汽压力和持续时间成正比。在许多情况下,由于自由流动而不是下沉,井仍然保留一些能量和压力仍然很高,因此可以使用压井。压井程序带来了另一组挑战,例如;由于粘度降低、盐水混合成本和错误的压力估计导致干预时间延长,泵启动面临挑战。CSS面临的挑战为创新提供了机会,在高温高压条件下,只需取出最少的棒或将棒重新放入热井即可进行转换。新概念是双杆防喷器(BOP)和抽提器密封的串联组合。2017年11月进行的一项试验取得了积极的结果,这一创新的优势得到了清楚的证明。本文总结了设计方法和成功的试验证明了这一概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信