Access to Justice software development, Participatory Action Research Methods and Researching the Lived Experiences of British Military Veterans

O. Olusanya, W. Collier, S. Marshall, Victoria Knapp, Alex Baldwin
{"title":"Access to Justice software development, Participatory Action Research Methods and Researching the Lived Experiences of British Military Veterans","authors":"O. Olusanya, W. Collier, S. Marshall, Victoria Knapp, Alex Baldwin","doi":"10.19164/jlrm.v2i1.1240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participatory action research (PAR) methods aim to position the people who are most affected by the issue being studied as equal partners in the research process through a cyclical process of data gathering, data analysis, planning and implementing action and evaluation and reflection. In doing so, it ensures that the research better reflects participants’ ideas, priorities, and needs, thereby enhancing its validity and relevance and the support for the findings and proposed changes. Furthermore, it generates immediately applicable results. In this paper, we reflect on our experiences of developing the UK’s first access to justice platform for veterans and their families through an ongoing PAR project that brought together armed forces veterans, representatives from veterans' service providers, and the Veterans Legal Link team members comprising of legal academics, lawyers, sociologists, computer software designers and graphic designers to collect, interpret, and apply community information to address issues related to the delivery of access to justice. We present findings from Stages 1 and 2 of our three-stage iterative research process which includes the following steps: Understanding and cross-checking the lived experience of the veteran community (Stage 1), developing and testing a prototype of the access to justice platform (Stage 2) and creating the final product and giving real users an opportunity to use the platform (Stage 3). Data collection and analysis from Stage 1 of the study informed the themes that underpinned Stage 2. Specifically, data was collected through the following methods: co-facilitated focus group discussions, a web survey that was codesigned with veteran community stakeholders and remote and digitally enabled ethnographic research methods. We include several reflections that may help legal practitioners and researchers interested in applying PAR within the area of access to justice and the field of legal research.","PeriodicalId":212730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Research Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19164/jlrm.v2i1.1240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participatory action research (PAR) methods aim to position the people who are most affected by the issue being studied as equal partners in the research process through a cyclical process of data gathering, data analysis, planning and implementing action and evaluation and reflection. In doing so, it ensures that the research better reflects participants’ ideas, priorities, and needs, thereby enhancing its validity and relevance and the support for the findings and proposed changes. Furthermore, it generates immediately applicable results. In this paper, we reflect on our experiences of developing the UK’s first access to justice platform for veterans and their families through an ongoing PAR project that brought together armed forces veterans, representatives from veterans' service providers, and the Veterans Legal Link team members comprising of legal academics, lawyers, sociologists, computer software designers and graphic designers to collect, interpret, and apply community information to address issues related to the delivery of access to justice. We present findings from Stages 1 and 2 of our three-stage iterative research process which includes the following steps: Understanding and cross-checking the lived experience of the veteran community (Stage 1), developing and testing a prototype of the access to justice platform (Stage 2) and creating the final product and giving real users an opportunity to use the platform (Stage 3). Data collection and analysis from Stage 1 of the study informed the themes that underpinned Stage 2. Specifically, data was collected through the following methods: co-facilitated focus group discussions, a web survey that was codesigned with veteran community stakeholders and remote and digitally enabled ethnographic research methods. We include several reflections that may help legal practitioners and researchers interested in applying PAR within the area of access to justice and the field of legal research.
获取司法软件开发,参与式行动研究方法和研究英国退伍军人的生活经历
参与式行动研究(PAR)方法旨在通过数据收集、数据分析、规划和实施行动以及评价和反思的循环过程,将受所研究问题影响最大的人定位为研究过程中的平等伙伴。在这样做的过程中,它确保研究更好地反映参与者的想法、优先事项和需求,从而增强其有效性和相关性,以及对研究结果和拟议变化的支持。此外,它产生立即适用的结果。在本文中,我们反思了我们通过一个正在进行的PAR项目为退伍军人及其家人开发英国第一个获得司法平台的经验,该项目汇集了武装部队退伍军人,退伍军人服务提供者的代表以及退伍军人法律联系团队成员,包括法律学者,律师,社会学家,计算机软件设计师和平面设计师,收集,解释,并应用社区信息来解决与提供司法机会有关的问题。我们展示了我们的三阶段迭代研究过程的第一阶段和第二阶段的发现,该过程包括以下步骤:理解和交叉检查退伍军人社区的生活经验(第一阶段),开发和测试司法平台的原型(第二阶段),创建最终产品并让真正的用户有机会使用该平台(第三阶段)。研究第一阶段的数据收集和分析为支撑第二阶段的主题提供了信息。具体来说,收集数据的方法包括:共同推动焦点小组讨论,与资深社区利益相关者共同设计的网络调查,以及远程和数字化的民族志研究方法。我们包含了一些反思,可能有助于有兴趣在诉诸司法和法律研究领域应用PAR的法律从业人员和研究人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信