The Two-Week Rule for NHS Gastrointestinal Cancer Referrals: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Effectiveness

K. Thorne, H. Hutchings, G. Elwyn
{"title":"The Two-Week Rule for NHS Gastrointestinal Cancer Referrals: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Effectiveness","authors":"K. Thorne, H. Hutchings, G. Elwyn","doi":"10.2174/1876820200902010027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To systematically review the impact of the Two-Week Rule in increasing the pick-up rate of colorectal cancers and Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the NHS. Materials and Methods: Data were combined for meta-analyses to determine (1) the Two-Week Rule pick-up rate for each cancer type and (2) the proportion of patients referred using the Two-Week Rule. Overall results were given as weighted averages. Results: There were 20 articles and 27 peer-reviewed abstracts included in this review. Colorectal Cancer: Only 9.5% of patients referred by the Two-Week Rule were eventually diagnosed with colorectal cancer (n = 24). When examining the referral origin of all colorectal cancer patients diagnosed during the time of 19 studies with this data, 32.2% had been re- ferred using the Two-Week Rule. Upper GI Cancer: Only 5.5% of patients referred by the Two-Week Rule were eventu- ally diagnosed with Upper GI cancer (n = 23). When examining the referral origin of all Upper GI cancer patients diag- nosed during the time of 17 studies with this data, 23.6% had been referred using the Two-Week Rule. Conclusion: The Two-Week Rule is not sufficiently effective in diagnosing neither upper GI nor colorectal cancers in pa- tients presenting to their General Practitioner. BACKGROUND The Two-Week Rule (TWR) referral (1) was introduced by the UK's New Labour government in 2000 as one of many initiatives tackling the increasing problem of patients presenting to their General Practitioner (GP) with symptoms indicative of a cancer who, although urgently referred, did not get a hospital appointment in sufficient time to signifi- cantly improve their health outcome. It was hoped that the TWR referral route would help to reduce the number of can- cer-related deaths by 20% in people under the age of 75 years by 2010, thereby saving approximately 130,000 lives (2). The scheme allowed GPs to \"fast-track\" these patients to shorten the length of time they waited for a diagnosis fol- lowed by potentially life saving treatment. TWR referrals were faxed to the relevant diagnostic unit using a dedicated number and an appointment was made for the patient within two weeks. Only delays due to patient choice were accept- able reasons to over-run the two week target. Disease-specific guidelines (3, 4) were published with the aim of helping GPs make decisions about when to refer people to specialists when they presented with symptoms that could have been caused by cancer. This would facilitate the appropriate referral of suspected cancer patients using the TWR. In the case of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, the referral guidelines applied to upper GI cancers (UGCs) including oesophageal and gastric cancer, and colorectal cancers (CRCs).","PeriodicalId":331708,"journal":{"name":"The Open Colorectal Cancer Journal","volume":"240 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Colorectal Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876820200902010027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Aim: To systematically review the impact of the Two-Week Rule in increasing the pick-up rate of colorectal cancers and Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the NHS. Materials and Methods: Data were combined for meta-analyses to determine (1) the Two-Week Rule pick-up rate for each cancer type and (2) the proportion of patients referred using the Two-Week Rule. Overall results were given as weighted averages. Results: There were 20 articles and 27 peer-reviewed abstracts included in this review. Colorectal Cancer: Only 9.5% of patients referred by the Two-Week Rule were eventually diagnosed with colorectal cancer (n = 24). When examining the referral origin of all colorectal cancer patients diagnosed during the time of 19 studies with this data, 32.2% had been re- ferred using the Two-Week Rule. Upper GI Cancer: Only 5.5% of patients referred by the Two-Week Rule were eventu- ally diagnosed with Upper GI cancer (n = 23). When examining the referral origin of all Upper GI cancer patients diag- nosed during the time of 17 studies with this data, 23.6% had been referred using the Two-Week Rule. Conclusion: The Two-Week Rule is not sufficiently effective in diagnosing neither upper GI nor colorectal cancers in pa- tients presenting to their General Practitioner. BACKGROUND The Two-Week Rule (TWR) referral (1) was introduced by the UK's New Labour government in 2000 as one of many initiatives tackling the increasing problem of patients presenting to their General Practitioner (GP) with symptoms indicative of a cancer who, although urgently referred, did not get a hospital appointment in sufficient time to signifi- cantly improve their health outcome. It was hoped that the TWR referral route would help to reduce the number of can- cer-related deaths by 20% in people under the age of 75 years by 2010, thereby saving approximately 130,000 lives (2). The scheme allowed GPs to "fast-track" these patients to shorten the length of time they waited for a diagnosis fol- lowed by potentially life saving treatment. TWR referrals were faxed to the relevant diagnostic unit using a dedicated number and an appointment was made for the patient within two weeks. Only delays due to patient choice were accept- able reasons to over-run the two week target. Disease-specific guidelines (3, 4) were published with the aim of helping GPs make decisions about when to refer people to specialists when they presented with symptoms that could have been caused by cancer. This would facilitate the appropriate referral of suspected cancer patients using the TWR. In the case of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, the referral guidelines applied to upper GI cancers (UGCs) including oesophageal and gastric cancer, and colorectal cancers (CRCs).
NHS胃肠道癌症转诊的两周规则:诊断有效性的系统评价
目的:系统地回顾两周规则在增加结肠直肠癌和上胃肠道(GI)癌症在NHS的拾取率的影响。材料和方法:将数据合并进行荟萃分析,以确定(1)每种癌症类型的两周规则拾取率和(2)使用两周规则转诊的患者比例。总体结果以加权平均值给出。结果:本综述共纳入20篇文献和27篇同行评议摘要。结直肠癌:只有9.5%的患者根据两周规则最终被诊断为结直肠癌(n = 24)。当检查19项研究中诊断的所有结直肠癌患者的转诊来源时,32.2%的患者使用了“两周规则”。上消化道肿瘤:根据两周规则转诊的患者中只有5.5%最终被诊断为上消化道肿瘤(n = 23)。当检查17项研究中诊断出的所有上消化道癌症患者的转诊来源时,23.6%的患者使用了两周规则。结论:在向全科医生就诊的病人中,两周常规在诊断上消化道和结直肠癌方面都不够有效。背景:两周规则(TWR)转诊(1)是由英国新工党政府于2000年引入的,作为解决越来越多的患者向他们的全科医生(GP)提出癌症症状的问题的众多举措之一,这些患者虽然紧急转诊,但没有得到足够的时间来显著改善他们的健康结果。人们希望,到2010年,TWR转诊路线将有助于将75岁以下人群中与癌症相关的死亡人数减少20%,从而挽救大约13万人的生命(2)。该计划允许全科医生“快速追踪”这些患者,以缩短他们等待诊断的时间,然后进行可能挽救生命的治疗。TWR转介使用专用号码传真到相关诊断单位,并在两周内为患者预约。只有由于病人的选择而造成的延误是超过两周目标的可接受的原因。特定疾病指南(3,4)的出版目的是帮助全科医生在患者出现可能由癌症引起的症状时决定何时将其转介给专科医生。这将有助于使用TWR适当转介疑似癌症患者。在胃肠道(GI)癌症的情况下,转诊指南适用于上消化道癌症(UGCs),包括食道癌、胃癌和结直肠癌(crc)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信