Comparative study on African catfish (Burchell, 1822) hypophysation using ovaprim and chicken pituitary gland extract

S. G. Odu-Onikosi, B. Faleti, T. F. Sunnuvu, F. A. Fakunmoju, O. Babalola
{"title":"Comparative study on African catfish (Burchell, 1822) hypophysation using ovaprim and chicken pituitary gland extract","authors":"S. G. Odu-Onikosi, B. Faleti, T. F. Sunnuvu, F. A. Fakunmoju, O. Babalola","doi":"10.31248/GJFS2021.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparative study on African catfish hypophysation indices using ovaprim and chicken pituitary gland extract (CPGE) was carried out. Sixteen (16) African catfish brood stocks between 1100 and 2300 g in ratio 2:1 and four (4) numbers of layer birds (Gallus gallus domesticus) between 1200 and 2200 g in ratio 1:3 were used respectively. The experiment was batched into “A” and “B”. Batch ‘A’ was placed on ovaprim while batch ‘B’ was placed on CPGE. An indoor hatchery vat, measuring 0.6096 m x 1.8288 m x 0.3048 m each was used for the incubation. Digital measuring kits were used to monitor water quality parameters and measurement of the brood stocks weights independently. Brood stocks on ovaprim and CPGE treatments had the following mean hypophysation indices in these order: fecundity (11100±7690 and 17760±13863), latency period (9.53±0.54 and 9.77±0.49), fertilization percentage (94.03±5.90% and 90.6±10.11%), hatchability percentage (75.6±0.81% and79.35±10.27%), number of eggs produced (5889±657.37 and 9403.33±589.80), total number of larvae hatched (4717.33±1111.0 and 7111.33±506.64), SGR (0.67±0.31 and 1.1±0.31), and survival rate (64.81±0.71 and66.24±2.19) respectively. There was no significant difference (p = 0.05) in the mean values of fecundity, latency period, fertilization and hatchability percentages in both treatments but there was significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) in number of eggs produced and total number of larvae hatched in both treatments. The water quality parameters were within the range for induced breeding techniques and there was no significant difference (p= 0.05) in both experiments. Both ovaprim and CPGE had excellent results from the induced breeding of Clarias gariepinus and yielded good results. Therefore, CPGE could be recommended from the view point of excellent results and its availability from chicken slaughter houses as against ovaprim which are imported.","PeriodicalId":136379,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Fisheries Science","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Fisheries Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31248/GJFS2021.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparative study on African catfish hypophysation indices using ovaprim and chicken pituitary gland extract (CPGE) was carried out. Sixteen (16) African catfish brood stocks between 1100 and 2300 g in ratio 2:1 and four (4) numbers of layer birds (Gallus gallus domesticus) between 1200 and 2200 g in ratio 1:3 were used respectively. The experiment was batched into “A” and “B”. Batch ‘A’ was placed on ovaprim while batch ‘B’ was placed on CPGE. An indoor hatchery vat, measuring 0.6096 m x 1.8288 m x 0.3048 m each was used for the incubation. Digital measuring kits were used to monitor water quality parameters and measurement of the brood stocks weights independently. Brood stocks on ovaprim and CPGE treatments had the following mean hypophysation indices in these order: fecundity (11100±7690 and 17760±13863), latency period (9.53±0.54 and 9.77±0.49), fertilization percentage (94.03±5.90% and 90.6±10.11%), hatchability percentage (75.6±0.81% and79.35±10.27%), number of eggs produced (5889±657.37 and 9403.33±589.80), total number of larvae hatched (4717.33±1111.0 and 7111.33±506.64), SGR (0.67±0.31 and 1.1±0.31), and survival rate (64.81±0.71 and66.24±2.19) respectively. There was no significant difference (p = 0.05) in the mean values of fecundity, latency period, fertilization and hatchability percentages in both treatments but there was significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) in number of eggs produced and total number of larvae hatched in both treatments. The water quality parameters were within the range for induced breeding techniques and there was no significant difference (p= 0.05) in both experiments. Both ovaprim and CPGE had excellent results from the induced breeding of Clarias gariepinus and yielded good results. Therefore, CPGE could be recommended from the view point of excellent results and its availability from chicken slaughter houses as against ovaprim which are imported.
使用ovaprim和鸡脑垂体提取物对非洲鲶鱼(Burchell, 1822) hypoophysation的比较研究
比较研究了ovaprim和鸡脑垂体提取物(CPGE)对非洲鲶鱼垂体指数的影响。分别使用16只1100 ~ 2300 g(比例为2:1)的非洲鲶鱼和4只1200 ~ 2200 g(比例为1:3)的蛋鸟。实验分为“A”和“B”。批“A”放置在ovaprim上,批“B”放置在CPGE上。孵育使用室内孵化池,尺寸为0.6096 m × 1.8288 m × 0.3048 m。采用数字测量仪对水质参数进行独立监测,并对育苗群体重进行独立测量。ovaprim和CPGE处理的育雏种群的平均hypophation指数依次为:产卵量(11100±7690和17760±13863)、潜伏期(9.53±0.54和9.77±0.49)、受精率(94.03±5.90%和90.6±10.11%)、孵化率(75.6±0.81%和79.35±10.27%)、产卵数(5889±657.37和9403.33±589.80)、孵化总幼虫数(4717.33±1111.0和7111.33±506.64)、SGR(0.67±0.31和1.1±0.31)和存活率(64.81±0.71和66.24±2.19)。2个处理的产卵率、潜伏期、受精率和孵化率平均值差异不显著(p = 0.05),但产蛋数和总孵化数差异显著(p≤0.05)。两个试验的水质参数均在诱导养殖技术的范围内,差异不显著(p= 0.05)。ovaprim和CPGE对Clarias gariepinus的诱导育种均取得了良好的效果。因此,与进口的ovaprim相比,CPGE具有优异的效果和在鸡屠宰场的可用性,因此可以推荐CPGE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信