Speed Me up if You Can: Conditional Lower Bounds on Opacity Verification

Jivr'i Balun, Tomas Masopust, Petr Osivcka
{"title":"Speed Me up if You Can: Conditional Lower Bounds on Opacity Verification","authors":"Jivr'i Balun, Tomas Masopust, Petr Osivcka","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2304.09920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opacity is a property of privacy and security applications asking whether, given a system model, a passive intruder that makes online observations of system's behaviour can ascertain some\"secret\"information of the system. Deciding opacity is a PSpace-complete problem, and hence there are no polynomial-time algorithms to verify opacity under the assumption that PSpace differs from PTime. This assumption, however, gives rise to a question whether the existing exponential-time algorithms are the best possible or whether there are faster, sub-exponential-time algorithms. We show that under the (Strong) Exponential Time Hypothesis, there are no algorithms that would be significantly faster than the existing algorithms. As a by-product, we obtained a new conditional lower bound on the time complexity of deciding universality (and therefore also inclusion and equivalence) for nondeterministic finite automata.","PeriodicalId":369104,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.09920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opacity is a property of privacy and security applications asking whether, given a system model, a passive intruder that makes online observations of system's behaviour can ascertain some"secret"information of the system. Deciding opacity is a PSpace-complete problem, and hence there are no polynomial-time algorithms to verify opacity under the assumption that PSpace differs from PTime. This assumption, however, gives rise to a question whether the existing exponential-time algorithms are the best possible or whether there are faster, sub-exponential-time algorithms. We show that under the (Strong) Exponential Time Hypothesis, there are no algorithms that would be significantly faster than the existing algorithms. As a by-product, we obtained a new conditional lower bound on the time complexity of deciding universality (and therefore also inclusion and equivalence) for nondeterministic finite automata.
如果可以,请加快速度:不透明度验证的条件下界
不透明性是隐私和安全应用程序的一种属性,这些应用程序询问,给定一个系统模型,一个对系统行为进行在线观察的被动入侵者能否确定系统的一些“秘密”信息。决定不透明度是一个PSpace-complete问题,因此在假设PSpace和PTime不同的情况下,没有多项式时间算法来验证不透明度。然而,这个假设引起了一个问题,即现有的指数时间算法是否是最好的,或者是否有更快的次指数时间算法。我们表明,在(强)指数时间假设下,没有算法会比现有算法快得多。作为一个副产品,我们得到了决定不确定性有限自动机的通用性(以及包含性和等价性)的时间复杂度的一个新的条件下界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信