Lawyers’ Use of the Website of the Supreme Judicial Council and the Gratifications Obtained from It Drawn Research Submitted for the Study of the Higher Professional Diploma

Lecturer Zina Abd Al-Khaleq, Abd Al-Rahman. Ph.D.،, Ali Abbas, Hashim Abd Lecturer
{"title":"Lawyers’ Use of the Website of the Supreme Judicial Council and the Gratifications Obtained from It Drawn Research Submitted for the Study of the Higher Professional Diploma","authors":"Lecturer Zina Abd Al-Khaleq, Abd Al-Rahman. Ph.D.،, Ali Abbas, Hashim Abd Lecturer","doi":"10.33282/abaa.v14i56.883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field study of this paper focused on the motives for lawyers to use the website\nof the Supreme Judicial Council, and the gratifications achieved as a result of its use.\nThis study sought to achieve a number of goals, including:\n1. Monitoring the patterns of lawyers’ use of the website of the Supreme Judicial Council.\n2. Determining the forms that lawyers use to interact on the website of the Supreme\nJudicial Council.\nThis study is a descriptive in kind as the researcher relied on the ‘survey method’ in\nits study of the external audience (lawyers) using the questionnaire and scale toolThe questionnaire was distributed among a deliberately chosen sample, consisting of\n(160) lawyers who used the website of the Supreme Judicial Council. The study ended\nwith a set of results, the most important of which are:\nA. It turns out: Lawyers’ use of the website of the Supreme Judicial Council is as follows:\nLawyers’ use of the website which came in first place is of (on average twice\na week), followed by second place is of (three times a week), and third is of (once a\nweek).\nB. The results showed that: The utilitarian motives for lawyers’ use of the website\nwere as follows: the one is ranked first (it keeps me in line with the development\nin my legal field), while the one ranked last (it gives me the opportunity to express\nmy opinion on various legal cases). As for ritual motives, this category is ranked first\n(which contributes to the dissemination of legal texts that are useful to others), while\nthe category (which helps to get rid of personal problems and forget them and the\ndesire to have fun) is ranked last..","PeriodicalId":201372,"journal":{"name":"AL – Bahith AL – A a‚LAMI","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AL – Bahith AL – A a‚LAMI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33282/abaa.v14i56.883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The field study of this paper focused on the motives for lawyers to use the website of the Supreme Judicial Council, and the gratifications achieved as a result of its use. This study sought to achieve a number of goals, including: 1. Monitoring the patterns of lawyers’ use of the website of the Supreme Judicial Council. 2. Determining the forms that lawyers use to interact on the website of the Supreme Judicial Council. This study is a descriptive in kind as the researcher relied on the ‘survey method’ in its study of the external audience (lawyers) using the questionnaire and scale toolThe questionnaire was distributed among a deliberately chosen sample, consisting of (160) lawyers who used the website of the Supreme Judicial Council. The study ended with a set of results, the most important of which are: A. It turns out: Lawyers’ use of the website of the Supreme Judicial Council is as follows: Lawyers’ use of the website which came in first place is of (on average twice a week), followed by second place is of (three times a week), and third is of (once a week). B. The results showed that: The utilitarian motives for lawyers’ use of the website were as follows: the one is ranked first (it keeps me in line with the development in my legal field), while the one ranked last (it gives me the opportunity to express my opinion on various legal cases). As for ritual motives, this category is ranked first (which contributes to the dissemination of legal texts that are useful to others), while the category (which helps to get rid of personal problems and forget them and the desire to have fun) is ranked last..
律师对最高司法委员会网站的使用及从中获得的满足感——高级职业文凭学习提交研究
本文的实地研究重点是律师使用最高司法委员会网站的动机,以及使用网站所获得的满足感。本研究力求达到若干目标,包括:1。1 .监测律师使用最高司法委员会网站的模式。确定律师在最高司法委员会网站上使用的互动形式。本研究是一种描述性的研究,因为研究者依靠“调查方法”来研究外部受众(律师),使用调查问卷和量表工具。调查问卷是在精心选择的样本中分发的,其中包括使用最高司法委员会网站的(160)名律师。这项研究得出了一系列结果,其中最重要的是:a。结果表明:律师使用最高司法委员会网站的次数如下:排名第一的律师使用最高司法委员会网站的次数为2次(平均每周2次),排名第二的律师使用最高司法委员会网站的次数为1次(每周3次),排名第三的律师使用最高司法委员会网站的次数为1次(每周1次)。结果表明:律师使用网站的功利动机为:排名第一的功利动机(它使我与我的法律领域的发展保持一致),排名最后的功利动机(它使我有机会对各种法律案件发表自己的意见)。至于仪式动机,这一类别排名第一(有助于传播对他人有用的法律文本),而这一类别(有助于摆脱和忘记个人问题和享乐的欲望)排名最后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信