Aegean Sea Issue Urgency on Maritime Jurisdiction and Territorial water extension between Turkey and Greece

Tobias Binsar
{"title":"Aegean Sea Issue Urgency on Maritime Jurisdiction and Territorial water extension between Turkey and Greece","authors":"Tobias Binsar","doi":"10.23920/pjil.v6i2.993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The  Aegean sea issue is a long case that first occurred in 1950, the main issue  of this case revolves on the geographical condition that has led Turkey and Greece on fighting over supremacy to take control of the Aegean sea area. The issue of both Turkey and Greece has earlier been submitted to the ICJ however, its lack of jurisdiction causes the issue itself to remain unresolved. In 2020 Greece has stated that they are looking forward to extending their territorial waters, the statement itself might become a big issue for Turkey and has further proved the urgency of actual maritime jurisdiction and real resolution towards the Aegean sea issue. The goal of this research is to clarify and find a resolution that can be used under the situation of the Aegean sea issue in both international legal theory and practice. Apart from giving clarification of possible and available Legal instruments and theories, this research will also elaborate even further on why Territorial water extension by Greece would call for an urgency, especially for Turkey. This research revealed that UNCLOS as an International law instrument still have some issues in practice of a unique circumstances issue like the Aegean Sea, and shows that in its practice both Turkey and Greece must have a good will intention to fully resolve the issue of Aegean sea to draw an end line to the long lasting issue of maritime jurisdiction over its territorial sea.","PeriodicalId":177191,"journal":{"name":"Padjadjaran Journal of International Law","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Padjadjaran Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23920/pjil.v6i2.993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The  Aegean sea issue is a long case that first occurred in 1950, the main issue  of this case revolves on the geographical condition that has led Turkey and Greece on fighting over supremacy to take control of the Aegean sea area. The issue of both Turkey and Greece has earlier been submitted to the ICJ however, its lack of jurisdiction causes the issue itself to remain unresolved. In 2020 Greece has stated that they are looking forward to extending their territorial waters, the statement itself might become a big issue for Turkey and has further proved the urgency of actual maritime jurisdiction and real resolution towards the Aegean sea issue. The goal of this research is to clarify and find a resolution that can be used under the situation of the Aegean sea issue in both international legal theory and practice. Apart from giving clarification of possible and available Legal instruments and theories, this research will also elaborate even further on why Territorial water extension by Greece would call for an urgency, especially for Turkey. This research revealed that UNCLOS as an International law instrument still have some issues in practice of a unique circumstances issue like the Aegean Sea, and shows that in its practice both Turkey and Greece must have a good will intention to fully resolve the issue of Aegean sea to draw an end line to the long lasting issue of maritime jurisdiction over its territorial sea.
爱琴海问题:土耳其和希腊之间海事管辖权和领海扩展的紧迫性
爱琴海问题是1950年首次发生的一个长期案件,该案件的主要问题围绕导致土耳其和希腊争夺爱琴海地区控制权的地理条件展开。土耳其和希腊的问题早些时候已提交国际法院,但是,由于国际法院缺乏管辖权,问题本身仍未得到解决。2020年希腊表示期待扩大其领海,这一声明本身可能成为土耳其的一个大问题,并进一步证明了实际海洋管辖权和真正解决爱琴海问题的紧迫性。本研究的目的是在国际法理论和实践中厘清并找到一种可以在爱琴海问题的情况下使用的解决办法。除了澄清可能的和现有的法律文书和理论外,这项研究还将进一步阐述为什么希腊扩大领海需要紧急处理,特别是对土耳其来说。这一研究揭示了《联合国海洋法公约》作为一项国际法文书在爱琴海这一特殊情况问题的实践中仍存在一些问题,并表明土耳其和希腊在其实践中都必须有充分解决爱琴海问题的良好意愿,从而为长期存在的领海海洋管辖权问题画上句号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信