Autonomy Strengthens the Predictive Power of Involvement Load Hypothesis on Students' Productive Vocabulary Performance

G. Huang
{"title":"Autonomy Strengthens the Predictive Power of Involvement Load Hypothesis on Students' Productive Vocabulary Performance","authors":"G. Huang","doi":"10.1109/ISET55194.2022.00055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notwithstanding a proliferation of research on the Involvement Load Hypothesis (ILH), many practitioners remain divided over whether ILH could bolster students' productive vocabulary acquisition. The present study hypothesized that ‘autonomy’ could complement ILH in facilitating students' productive vocabulary performance. Two WeChat Applets (Applet 1.0 and Applet 2.0) were designed to help Chinese EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners apply productive vocabularies. Applet 1.0 was informed by ILH. Applet 2.0 was based on ILH with the added support of autonomous learning activities. Specifically, Applet 1.0 only provided reading materials. By contrast, learners who studied with Applet 2.0 could autonomously choose different learning materials embedded with the target words: videos, pictures and texts. To testify our hypothesis, we randomly selected two groups of students (N = 49) and divided them into a control group (CG, N = 26) and an experimental group (EG, N = 23). Both groups were asked to write a composition every week while learning with different Applets (CG learned with Applet 1.0 and EG studied with Applet 2.0). Three paragraph-writing tests (pre-test, post-test and delayed-test) were conducted to gauge students' productive vocabulary development. We found the EG performed significantly better than CG in terms of productive vocabulary learning in the post-test and delayed-test. Therefore, this paper suggested that autonomy could advance the effects of ILH and result in better productive vocabulary performance.","PeriodicalId":365516,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)","volume":"503 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET55194.2022.00055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Notwithstanding a proliferation of research on the Involvement Load Hypothesis (ILH), many practitioners remain divided over whether ILH could bolster students' productive vocabulary acquisition. The present study hypothesized that ‘autonomy’ could complement ILH in facilitating students' productive vocabulary performance. Two WeChat Applets (Applet 1.0 and Applet 2.0) were designed to help Chinese EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners apply productive vocabularies. Applet 1.0 was informed by ILH. Applet 2.0 was based on ILH with the added support of autonomous learning activities. Specifically, Applet 1.0 only provided reading materials. By contrast, learners who studied with Applet 2.0 could autonomously choose different learning materials embedded with the target words: videos, pictures and texts. To testify our hypothesis, we randomly selected two groups of students (N = 49) and divided them into a control group (CG, N = 26) and an experimental group (EG, N = 23). Both groups were asked to write a composition every week while learning with different Applets (CG learned with Applet 1.0 and EG studied with Applet 2.0). Three paragraph-writing tests (pre-test, post-test and delayed-test) were conducted to gauge students' productive vocabulary development. We found the EG performed significantly better than CG in terms of productive vocabulary learning in the post-test and delayed-test. Therefore, this paper suggested that autonomy could advance the effects of ILH and result in better productive vocabulary performance.
自主性增强涉入负荷假说对学生生产性词汇表现的预测力
尽管对涉入负荷假说(ILH)的研究越来越多,但对于涉入负荷是否能促进学生的生产性词汇习得,许多实践者仍存在分歧。本研究假设“自主性”可以补充ILH,促进学生的生产性词汇表现。我们设计了两个微信小程序(Applet 1.0和Applet 2.0)来帮助中国的英语学习者应用生产性词汇。Applet 1.0由ILH通知。Applet 2.0基于ILH,增加了自主学习活动的支持。具体来说,Applet 1.0只提供阅读材料。相比之下,使用Applet 2.0学习的学习者可以自主选择嵌入目标单词的不同学习材料:视频、图片和文本。为了验证我们的假设,我们随机选择了两组学生(N = 49),将他们分为对照组(CG, N = 26)和实验组(EG, N = 23)。两组都被要求每周写一篇作文,同时使用不同的Applet学习(CG使用Applet 1.0学习,EG使用Applet 2.0学习)。通过三个段落写作测试(测试前、测试后和延迟测试)来衡量学生的生产性词汇发展。我们发现,在测试后和延迟测试中,EG在生产性词汇学习方面的表现明显优于CG。因此,本文认为自主性可以促进词汇学习的效果,提高词汇学习的产出性表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信