Navigating multiple accountabilities through managers’ boundary work in professional service firms

Ricardo Azambuja, Lisa Baudot, B. Malsch
{"title":"Navigating multiple accountabilities through managers’ boundary work in professional service firms","authors":"Ricardo Azambuja, Lisa Baudot, B. Malsch","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-08-2021-5407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study explores the professional work of managers in professional service firms (PSFs) by focusing on the relational position of managers as they interface between diverse groups of actors and navigate a multiplicity of accountabilities.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on an ethnographic study of managers in a Brazilian PSF, this study demonstrates through observations, interviews and shadowing how PSF managers address multiple accountabilities in the conduct of professional work.FindingsTo navigate multiple accountabilities, PSF managers perform several forms of boundary work, which the authors conceptualize as “revamping” and “remolding” operations and “translating” and “transforming” understandings. The form of boundary work performed depends on the configuration of two elements of accountability demands: knowledge orientation and extent of exposure. Although analytically distinct, these elements intertwine, suggesting the need for a dynamic perspective on accountability. The analysis shows that professional work extends beyond fixed or passive views of hierarchical and intrinsic accountability to emphasize that managers exude accountability of an adaptive nature.Research limitations/implicationsThis study illustrates and theorizes the role of boundary work in PSFs, develops its link to accountability, and identifies its scholarly and practical affordances and limitations for understanding managers’ professional work when navigating multiple accountabilities.Originality/valueThe findings reveal perspectives and behaviors of managers embedded in PSFs, illustrating their unstructured and agentic experiences of accountability and boundary work in practice. The insights can be extended to other contexts where managers face multiple accountabilities in conducting professional work.","PeriodicalId":132341,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-08-2021-5407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis study explores the professional work of managers in professional service firms (PSFs) by focusing on the relational position of managers as they interface between diverse groups of actors and navigate a multiplicity of accountabilities.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on an ethnographic study of managers in a Brazilian PSF, this study demonstrates through observations, interviews and shadowing how PSF managers address multiple accountabilities in the conduct of professional work.FindingsTo navigate multiple accountabilities, PSF managers perform several forms of boundary work, which the authors conceptualize as “revamping” and “remolding” operations and “translating” and “transforming” understandings. The form of boundary work performed depends on the configuration of two elements of accountability demands: knowledge orientation and extent of exposure. Although analytically distinct, these elements intertwine, suggesting the need for a dynamic perspective on accountability. The analysis shows that professional work extends beyond fixed or passive views of hierarchical and intrinsic accountability to emphasize that managers exude accountability of an adaptive nature.Research limitations/implicationsThis study illustrates and theorizes the role of boundary work in PSFs, develops its link to accountability, and identifies its scholarly and practical affordances and limitations for understanding managers’ professional work when navigating multiple accountabilities.Originality/valueThe findings reveal perspectives and behaviors of managers embedded in PSFs, illustrating their unstructured and agentic experiences of accountability and boundary work in practice. The insights can be extended to other contexts where managers face multiple accountabilities in conducting professional work.
通过专业服务公司管理人员的边界工作导航多重责任
本研究探讨了专业服务公司(psf)管理人员的专业工作,重点关注管理人员在不同行为者群体之间的关系地位,并在多重责任中导航。设计/方法/方法根据对巴西PSF管理者的民族志研究,本研究通过观察、访谈和跟踪来展示PSF管理者如何在专业工作中处理多重责任。为了应对多重责任,PSF经理执行几种形式的边界工作,作者将其概念化为“修改”和“重塑”操作以及“翻译”和“转换”理解。边界工作的形式取决于问责要求的两个要素的配置:知识导向和暴露程度。虽然在分析上是不同的,但这些因素相互交织,表明需要从动态的角度来看待问责制。分析表明,专业工作超越了等级和内在责任的固定或被动观点,强调管理人员散发出适应性的责任。本研究阐释了边界工作在psf中的作用,并将其理论化,发展了边界工作与问责制的联系,并确定了边界工作在学术和实践上的启示和局限性,以便在管理多重问责制时理解管理者的专业工作。原创性/价值研究结果揭示了psf中管理人员的观点和行为,说明了他们在实践中对问责制和边界工作的非结构化和代理体验。这些见解可以扩展到管理人员在进行专业工作时面临多重责任的其他情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信