The altered enlargement policy: Challenges and concentric circles of integration

M. Petrović
{"title":"The altered enlargement policy: Challenges and concentric circles of integration","authors":"M. Petrović","doi":"10.2298/medjp1901050p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the implementation of the enlargement policy at the end\n of the second decade of the 21st century, which occurred under considerably\n altered circumstances and in different dynamics in comparison to the\n previous cycles of the ?Eastern enlargements?. Unlike those accession cycles\n which were conducted under different circumstances and had been regionally\n and strategically directed in their approach so that the entire groups of\n countries could simultaneously join the Union, during the last decade there\n was a growing focus on strictly bilateral relations of Brussels with each\n candidate and its individual accomplishments within the ?accession regatta?,\n and on more intensive and earlier conditioning. In combination with the\n changed international circumstances, these resulted in a different treatment\n of the current accession candidates. The article points that the reasons for\n this have been the altered political circumstances and challenges in the\n functioning of the Union, the different international context, as well as\n insufficient progress in the remaining ?unintegrated? southeastern\n countries. With the accession policy falling behind and along with\n considerations regarding the reform plans within the European Union by the\n model of concentric cycles of integration, it appears to the author that\n further accession of EU candidates will retain different dynamics comparing\n to the previous enlargement rounds, and potentially result in a different\n form of integration in the future..","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"443 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp1901050p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper examines the implementation of the enlargement policy at the end of the second decade of the 21st century, which occurred under considerably altered circumstances and in different dynamics in comparison to the previous cycles of the ?Eastern enlargements?. Unlike those accession cycles which were conducted under different circumstances and had been regionally and strategically directed in their approach so that the entire groups of countries could simultaneously join the Union, during the last decade there was a growing focus on strictly bilateral relations of Brussels with each candidate and its individual accomplishments within the ?accession regatta?, and on more intensive and earlier conditioning. In combination with the changed international circumstances, these resulted in a different treatment of the current accession candidates. The article points that the reasons for this have been the altered political circumstances and challenges in the functioning of the Union, the different international context, as well as insufficient progress in the remaining ?unintegrated? southeastern countries. With the accession policy falling behind and along with considerations regarding the reform plans within the European Union by the model of concentric cycles of integration, it appears to the author that further accession of EU candidates will retain different dynamics comparing to the previous enlargement rounds, and potentially result in a different form of integration in the future..
改变后的扩大政策:一体化的挑战和同心圆
本文考察了21世纪第二个十年结束时东扩政策的实施情况,与之前的“东扩”周期相比,这一政策的实施情况和动态都发生了很大变化。与那些在不同情况下进行的加入周期不同,这些周期的做法是区域性和战略性的,以便整个国家集团能够同时加入欧盟,在过去十年中,布鲁塞尔越来越注重与每个候选国的严格双边关系及其在加入过程中的个别成就。以及更密集、更早的训练。再加上国际环境的变化,这些因素导致了对目前的入盟候选国的不同待遇。文章指出,造成这种情况的原因是改变了的政治环境和联盟运作方面的挑战,不同的国际环境,以及仍然“未一体化”的国家进展不足。东南部的国家。随着加入政策的落后,以及对欧盟内部改革计划的考虑,通过同心周期的一体化模型,作者认为,欧盟候选国的进一步加入将保持与前几轮扩大相比不同的动力,并可能导致未来不同形式的一体化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信