{"title":"The altered enlargement policy: Challenges and concentric circles of integration","authors":"M. Petrović","doi":"10.2298/medjp1901050p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the implementation of the enlargement policy at the end\n of the second decade of the 21st century, which occurred under considerably\n altered circumstances and in different dynamics in comparison to the\n previous cycles of the ?Eastern enlargements?. Unlike those accession cycles\n which were conducted under different circumstances and had been regionally\n and strategically directed in their approach so that the entire groups of\n countries could simultaneously join the Union, during the last decade there\n was a growing focus on strictly bilateral relations of Brussels with each\n candidate and its individual accomplishments within the ?accession regatta?,\n and on more intensive and earlier conditioning. In combination with the\n changed international circumstances, these resulted in a different treatment\n of the current accession candidates. The article points that the reasons for\n this have been the altered political circumstances and challenges in the\n functioning of the Union, the different international context, as well as\n insufficient progress in the remaining ?unintegrated? southeastern\n countries. With the accession policy falling behind and along with\n considerations regarding the reform plans within the European Union by the\n model of concentric cycles of integration, it appears to the author that\n further accession of EU candidates will retain different dynamics comparing\n to the previous enlargement rounds, and potentially result in a different\n form of integration in the future..","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"443 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp1901050p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The paper examines the implementation of the enlargement policy at the end
of the second decade of the 21st century, which occurred under considerably
altered circumstances and in different dynamics in comparison to the
previous cycles of the ?Eastern enlargements?. Unlike those accession cycles
which were conducted under different circumstances and had been regionally
and strategically directed in their approach so that the entire groups of
countries could simultaneously join the Union, during the last decade there
was a growing focus on strictly bilateral relations of Brussels with each
candidate and its individual accomplishments within the ?accession regatta?,
and on more intensive and earlier conditioning. In combination with the
changed international circumstances, these resulted in a different treatment
of the current accession candidates. The article points that the reasons for
this have been the altered political circumstances and challenges in the
functioning of the Union, the different international context, as well as
insufficient progress in the remaining ?unintegrated? southeastern
countries. With the accession policy falling behind and along with
considerations regarding the reform plans within the European Union by the
model of concentric cycles of integration, it appears to the author that
further accession of EU candidates will retain different dynamics comparing
to the previous enlargement rounds, and potentially result in a different
form of integration in the future..