Chapter Eight. Solomon, Aristoteles Judaicus, and the Invention of a Pseudo- Solomonic Library

{"title":"Chapter Eight. Solomon, Aristoteles Judaicus, and the Invention of a Pseudo- Solomonic Library","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110677263-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the thirteenth century saw the rise of Aristotle as a new contender for the role of “the wisest, most learned man of all times, the very personification of all knowledge”, Jewish scholars were faced with a new challenge: how to grapple with Aristotelian rationalist philosophy. One option was to declare it irrelevant, and present Judaism and Aristotelian philosophy as diametrically opposed; another option was to co-opt Aristotelian philosophy by depicting Aristotle as Solomon’s pupil. The result of this latter approach was the emergence of a legendary tradition whose purpose was to legitimize Jews’ study of philosophy, in general, and the influence of Aristotle, in particular. What developed was in many ways a continuation of traditions dating from the Hellenistic and Roman periods. But Jewish-Hellenistic writers,895 and later the Church Fathers, were concerned with the influence of the Jewish patriarchs, Moses, and the biblical prophets on the development of Egyptian and Greek wisdom—particularly that of Plato and Pythagoras. The new legendary tradition that emerged in medieval Jewish apologetics, on the margins of existing polemics between “Aristotelians” and “anti-Aristotelians”, claimed in contrast that Jewish “wisdom”, or Jewish “philosophy”, had been appropriated specifically by Aristotle. Not only was Solomon, then, the wisest of all ancients, a teacher to kings who arrived from all four corners of the earth to hear him; he was also a teacher to that “greatest of all philosophers,” Aristotle, whose teachings, in turn, informed the Christian scholastics.896 Seen through this lens, Aristotelian philosophy was no “Greek wisdom” extrinsic to Judaism, but rather a continuation of Jewish wisdom whose original form had been lost in the throes of history, only to be preserved in Greek garb. Its renewed reception into the bosom of Jewish culture was thus the restoration of what was lost to its former glory and rightful owner. Solomon was chosen for the role of Aristotle’s teacher since no ancient figure in Jewish history more famous than he could better represent lost wisdom. And since Aristotle dealt not only in philosophy but in all spheres of","PeriodicalId":221982,"journal":{"name":"An Imaginary Trio","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"An Imaginary Trio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110677263-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the thirteenth century saw the rise of Aristotle as a new contender for the role of “the wisest, most learned man of all times, the very personification of all knowledge”, Jewish scholars were faced with a new challenge: how to grapple with Aristotelian rationalist philosophy. One option was to declare it irrelevant, and present Judaism and Aristotelian philosophy as diametrically opposed; another option was to co-opt Aristotelian philosophy by depicting Aristotle as Solomon’s pupil. The result of this latter approach was the emergence of a legendary tradition whose purpose was to legitimize Jews’ study of philosophy, in general, and the influence of Aristotle, in particular. What developed was in many ways a continuation of traditions dating from the Hellenistic and Roman periods. But Jewish-Hellenistic writers,895 and later the Church Fathers, were concerned with the influence of the Jewish patriarchs, Moses, and the biblical prophets on the development of Egyptian and Greek wisdom—particularly that of Plato and Pythagoras. The new legendary tradition that emerged in medieval Jewish apologetics, on the margins of existing polemics between “Aristotelians” and “anti-Aristotelians”, claimed in contrast that Jewish “wisdom”, or Jewish “philosophy”, had been appropriated specifically by Aristotle. Not only was Solomon, then, the wisest of all ancients, a teacher to kings who arrived from all four corners of the earth to hear him; he was also a teacher to that “greatest of all philosophers,” Aristotle, whose teachings, in turn, informed the Christian scholastics.896 Seen through this lens, Aristotelian philosophy was no “Greek wisdom” extrinsic to Judaism, but rather a continuation of Jewish wisdom whose original form had been lost in the throes of history, only to be preserved in Greek garb. Its renewed reception into the bosom of Jewish culture was thus the restoration of what was lost to its former glory and rightful owner. Solomon was chosen for the role of Aristotle’s teacher since no ancient figure in Jewish history more famous than he could better represent lost wisdom. And since Aristotle dealt not only in philosophy but in all spheres of
第八章。所罗门、犹太亚里士多德和伪所罗门图书馆的发明
13世纪,亚里士多德崛起,成为“有史以来最聪明、最有学问的人,所有知识的化身”这一角色的新竞争者,犹太学者面临着一个新的挑战:如何与亚里士多德的理性主义哲学作斗争。一种选择是宣布它无关紧要,并将犹太教和亚里士多德哲学视为截然相反;另一种选择是通过将亚里士多德描绘成所罗门的学生来吸收亚里士多德的哲学。后一种方法的结果是一种传奇传统的出现,其目的是使犹太人对哲学的研究合法化,总的来说,尤其是亚里士多德的影响。在许多方面,发展起来的是希腊化和罗马时期传统的延续。但是犹太-希腊化作家,895年和后来的教父们,关注的是犹太族长摩西和圣经先知对埃及和希腊智慧发展的影响,尤其是柏拉图和毕达哥拉斯的影响。在“亚里士多德派”和“反亚里士多德派”之间现存论战的边缘,中世纪犹太护教学中出现了新的传奇传统,相反,他们声称犹太人的“智慧”或犹太人的“哲学”是亚里士多德专门利用的。那时,所罗门不仅是古代人中最聪明的,而且是从四面八方来听他演讲的国王的老师;他也是“最伟大的哲学家”亚里士多德的老师,而亚里士多德的教诲反过来又影响了基督教经院哲学家从这个角度来看,亚里士多德哲学并不是外来于犹太教的“希腊智慧”,而是犹太智慧的延续,而犹太智慧的原始形式已经在历史的阵痛中消失了,只是披上了希腊的外衣。因此,它被重新接纳到犹太文化的怀抱中,是对其昔日荣耀和合法所有者所失去的东西的恢复。所罗门被选为亚里士多德的老师,因为在犹太历史上,没有比他更著名的古代人物能更好地代表失落的智慧。因为亚里士多德不仅涉及哲学,而且涉及所有领域
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信