On the Impossibility of Maximal Scheduling for Strong Fairness with Interleaving

Matthew Lang, P. Sivilotti
{"title":"On the Impossibility of Maximal Scheduling for Strong Fairness with Interleaving","authors":"Matthew Lang, P. Sivilotti","doi":"10.1109/ICDCS.2009.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A strongly fair schedule is one in which tasks that are enabled infinitely often are also executed infinitely often. When tasks execute atomically, a strongly fair scheduler can be implemented in a maximal manner. That is, an algorithm exists that, for any valid schedule, is capable of generating that schedule. We show that this assumption of atomicity is necessary. That is, when task execution can be interleaved with other tasks, no algorithm is capable of generating all valid schedules. In other words,  any algorithm that correctly generates some strongly fair schedules must also be incapable of generating some other valid schedules.  This impossibility result is the first example of an implementable UNITY specification for which no maximal solution exists.","PeriodicalId":387968,"journal":{"name":"2009 29th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 29th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.2009.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

A strongly fair schedule is one in which tasks that are enabled infinitely often are also executed infinitely often. When tasks execute atomically, a strongly fair scheduler can be implemented in a maximal manner. That is, an algorithm exists that, for any valid schedule, is capable of generating that schedule. We show that this assumption of atomicity is necessary. That is, when task execution can be interleaved with other tasks, no algorithm is capable of generating all valid schedules. In other words,  any algorithm that correctly generates some strongly fair schedules must also be incapable of generating some other valid schedules.  This impossibility result is the first example of an implementable UNITY specification for which no maximal solution exists.
具有交错的强公平性的最大调度的不可能性
在强公平调度中,无限频繁启用的任务也会无限频繁地执行。当任务自动执行时,可以以最大的方式实现强公平调度器。也就是说,存在一种算法,对于任何有效的调度,都能够生成该调度。我们证明这种原子性假设是必要的。也就是说,当任务执行可以与其他任务交错时,没有任何算法能够生成所有有效的调度。换句话说,任何正确生成某些强公平调度的算法也必须不能生成其他一些有效调度。这个不可能的结果是一个可实现的UNITY规范的第一个例子,没有最大的解决方案存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信