Media Coverage and Food Commodities: Agricultural Futures Prices and Volatility Effects

M. Almanzar, M. Torero
{"title":"Media Coverage and Food Commodities: Agricultural Futures Prices and Volatility Effects","authors":"M. Almanzar, M. Torero","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3067949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine how media coverage of fluctuations in the price of agricultural commodities affects these prices and their volatility. We develop a unified empirical framework to analyze the media’s effects on both returns and volatility using insights from the literature. We use daily prices of futures contracts for soybeans, hard wheat, soft wheat, rice, and maize, complemented by a unique dataset that follows a comprehensive set of global media outlets and uses an algorithm to determine sophisticated relationships among phrases in a news article which signal an increase or decrease in the price of those four commodities. We find price effects that are economically important in size. Our estimates imply a net increasing effect of media coverage on the price of these four commodities; these effects are mostly concentrated in 2012 and from 2015 onwards, meaning that these effects are important in periods of both high and low prices. Across commodities, the price effects are concentrated in soybeans and maize. We find robust evidence that media coverage decreases volatility for these agricultural commodities on average for the period we study. The effects on volatility balance each other, with decreasing price coverage decreasing the variance of returns and increasing price coverage increasing the variance of returns of futures contracts of these commodities; however, the increase is than the decrease. Our results suggest that media coverage increases periods of normal volatility and decreases periods of excessive volatility. These results point to the potential of using media coverage to bring attention to price surges and to decrease volatility during food crises or times when there is above-normal volatility. The dynamics between the price of agricultural commodities and media coverage may help prevent knee-jerk policy reactions by discouraging market overreaction, encouraging market stability, and promoting food security. They highlight crucial role of providing appropriate information as fast as possible so media coverage and reflects the fundamentals that drive food commodity prices.","PeriodicalId":292025,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Commodity Markets eJournal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Commodity Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3067949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We examine how media coverage of fluctuations in the price of agricultural commodities affects these prices and their volatility. We develop a unified empirical framework to analyze the media’s effects on both returns and volatility using insights from the literature. We use daily prices of futures contracts for soybeans, hard wheat, soft wheat, rice, and maize, complemented by a unique dataset that follows a comprehensive set of global media outlets and uses an algorithm to determine sophisticated relationships among phrases in a news article which signal an increase or decrease in the price of those four commodities. We find price effects that are economically important in size. Our estimates imply a net increasing effect of media coverage on the price of these four commodities; these effects are mostly concentrated in 2012 and from 2015 onwards, meaning that these effects are important in periods of both high and low prices. Across commodities, the price effects are concentrated in soybeans and maize. We find robust evidence that media coverage decreases volatility for these agricultural commodities on average for the period we study. The effects on volatility balance each other, with decreasing price coverage decreasing the variance of returns and increasing price coverage increasing the variance of returns of futures contracts of these commodities; however, the increase is than the decrease. Our results suggest that media coverage increases periods of normal volatility and decreases periods of excessive volatility. These results point to the potential of using media coverage to bring attention to price surges and to decrease volatility during food crises or times when there is above-normal volatility. The dynamics between the price of agricultural commodities and media coverage may help prevent knee-jerk policy reactions by discouraging market overreaction, encouraging market stability, and promoting food security. They highlight crucial role of providing appropriate information as fast as possible so media coverage and reflects the fundamentals that drive food commodity prices.
媒体报道与食品商品:农产品期货价格和波动效应
我们研究了媒体对农产品价格波动的报道如何影响这些价格及其波动性。我们开发了一个统一的经验框架来分析媒体对回报率和波动性的影响。我们使用大豆、硬小麦、软小麦、大米和玉米期货合约的每日价格,辅以一个独特的数据集,该数据集遵循一套全面的全球媒体渠道,并使用一种算法来确定新闻文章中暗示这四种商品价格上涨或下跌的短语之间的复杂关系。我们发现价格效应在规模上具有重要的经济意义。我们的估计表明,媒体报道对这四种商品价格的净影响是增加的;这些影响主要集中在2012年和2015年以后,这意味着这些影响在价格高和低的时期都很重要。纵观大宗商品,价格上涨的影响主要集中在大豆和玉米上。我们发现有力的证据表明,在我们研究期间,媒体报道平均降低了这些农产品的波动性。对波动性的影响是相互平衡的,价格覆盖范围的减小减小了这些商品期货合约的收益方差,价格覆盖范围的增大增大了这些商品期货合约的收益方差;然而,增长大于减少。我们的研究结果表明,媒体报道增加了正常波动期,减少了过度波动期。这些结果表明,有可能利用媒体报道引起人们对价格飙升的关注,并在粮食危机期间或价格波动高于正常水平时减少价格波动。农产品价格与媒体报道之间的动态关系可能有助于防止下意识的政策反应,从而抑制市场过度反应,鼓励市场稳定,促进粮食安全。它们强调了尽快提供适当信息的关键作用,以便媒体报道,并反映推动粮食商品价格的基本面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信