Tsuga Convictio: Visualizing for the ecological, feminine, and embodied

Cathryn A. Ploehn, M. Steenson, Daragh Byrne
{"title":"Tsuga Convictio: Visualizing for the ecological, feminine, and embodied","authors":"Cathryn A. Ploehn, M. Steenson, Daragh Byrne","doi":"10.1109/VISAP51628.2020.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A good data visualization opens up space for good conversations. That is, a data visualization is a starting point in a discussion of a shared understanding of the world, a way for us to know together. Consequently, our practices as data visualization designers—through collecting data and portraying them visually—create (or reinforce) ways we can understand the world, and thus move through it—it’s ontological. Alarmingly, there is an emerging sense among new media artists and scholars that our practices of collecting and visualizing data can create rigid, harmful understandings of the world; ontologies of control. In particular, D’Ignazio and Klein argue in their book, Data Feminism, that our current practices of data science can lead to the “silencing, extraction, monetization, or invisibility” of people (or other living things) that the data represent [9]. In response to this violence, they assert that we need to make visible those who are creating the data, and those who are represented by the data. In other words, we need to “bring back the bodies.” This research interrogates how we might recenter the embodied, situated nature of data through the design of Tsuga Convictio, an experimental data collection process and a data visualization to support the conversations critical to our future—the reflective community conversations that help us belong to our human and ecological communities. By designing for these conversations, we discovered fluid, feminine, and embodied ways to create—and (re)enchant data visualizations. Along the way, we begin to answer some of the fundamental questions designers implicitly (and explicitly) answer when they make data visualizations. Most profoundly, we (re)imagine what visualizations can do—data visualizations are more than just tools of control; they are tools for imagination and transformation.","PeriodicalId":325118,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE VIS Arts Program (VISAP)","volume":"420 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE VIS Arts Program (VISAP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VISAP51628.2020.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A good data visualization opens up space for good conversations. That is, a data visualization is a starting point in a discussion of a shared understanding of the world, a way for us to know together. Consequently, our practices as data visualization designers—through collecting data and portraying them visually—create (or reinforce) ways we can understand the world, and thus move through it—it’s ontological. Alarmingly, there is an emerging sense among new media artists and scholars that our practices of collecting and visualizing data can create rigid, harmful understandings of the world; ontologies of control. In particular, D’Ignazio and Klein argue in their book, Data Feminism, that our current practices of data science can lead to the “silencing, extraction, monetization, or invisibility” of people (or other living things) that the data represent [9]. In response to this violence, they assert that we need to make visible those who are creating the data, and those who are represented by the data. In other words, we need to “bring back the bodies.” This research interrogates how we might recenter the embodied, situated nature of data through the design of Tsuga Convictio, an experimental data collection process and a data visualization to support the conversations critical to our future—the reflective community conversations that help us belong to our human and ecological communities. By designing for these conversations, we discovered fluid, feminine, and embodied ways to create—and (re)enchant data visualizations. Along the way, we begin to answer some of the fundamental questions designers implicitly (and explicitly) answer when they make data visualizations. Most profoundly, we (re)imagine what visualizations can do—data visualizations are more than just tools of control; they are tools for imagination and transformation.
Tsuga信念:为生态、女性化和具体化而可视化
良好的数据可视化为良好的对话打开了空间。也就是说,数据可视化是讨论对世界的共同理解的起点,是我们共同了解世界的一种方式。因此,我们作为数据可视化设计师的实践——通过收集数据并可视化地描绘它们——创造(或强化)了我们理解世界的方式,并因此在世界中移动——这是本体论的。令人担忧的是,在新媒体艺术家和学者中出现了一种新意识,即我们收集和可视化数据的做法可能会造成对世界僵化、有害的理解;控制本体。特别是,D’ignazio和Klein在他们的书《数据女权主义》中指出,我们目前的数据科学实践可能导致数据所代表的人(或其他生物)的“沉默、提取、货币化或隐形”[9]。作为对这种暴力的回应,他们断言,我们需要让那些创建数据的人和那些由数据代表的人可见。换句话说,我们需要“把尸体带回来”。本研究探讨了我们如何通过设计Tsuga定罪,实验数据收集过程和数据可视化来支持对我们未来至关重要的对话-反思性社区对话,帮助我们属于我们的人类和生态社区。通过为这些对话进行设计,我们发现了流畅、女性化和具体化的方式来创建和(重新)吸引数据可视化。在此过程中,我们开始回答设计师在进行数据可视化时隐式(或显式)回答的一些基本问题。最深刻的是,我们(重新)想象可视化能做什么——数据可视化不仅仅是控制工具;它们是想象力和变革的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信