User-centric evaluation of session-based recommendations for an automated radio station

Malte Ludewig, D. Jannach
{"title":"User-centric evaluation of session-based recommendations for an automated radio station","authors":"Malte Ludewig, D. Jannach","doi":"10.1145/3298689.3347046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The creation of an automated and virtually endless playlist given a start item is a common feature of modern media streaming services. When no past information about the user's preferences is available, the creation of such playlists can be done using session-based recommendation techniques. In this case, the recommendations only depend on the start item and the user's interactions in the current listening session, such as \"liking\" or skipping an item. In recent years, various novel session-based techniques were proposed, often based on deep learning. The evaluation of such approaches is in most cases solely based on offline experimentation and abstract accuracy measures. However, such evaluations cannot inform us about the quality as perceived by users. To close this research gap, we have conducted a user study (N=250), where the participants interacted with an automated online radio station. Each treatment group received recommendations that were generated by one of five different algorithms. Our results show that comparably simple techniques led to quality perceptions that are similar or even better than when a complex deep learning mechanism or Spotify's recommendations are used. The simple mechanisms, however, often tend to recommend comparably popular tracks, which can lead to lower discovery effects.","PeriodicalId":215384,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","volume":"416 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3298689.3347046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The creation of an automated and virtually endless playlist given a start item is a common feature of modern media streaming services. When no past information about the user's preferences is available, the creation of such playlists can be done using session-based recommendation techniques. In this case, the recommendations only depend on the start item and the user's interactions in the current listening session, such as "liking" or skipping an item. In recent years, various novel session-based techniques were proposed, often based on deep learning. The evaluation of such approaches is in most cases solely based on offline experimentation and abstract accuracy measures. However, such evaluations cannot inform us about the quality as perceived by users. To close this research gap, we have conducted a user study (N=250), where the participants interacted with an automated online radio station. Each treatment group received recommendations that were generated by one of five different algorithms. Our results show that comparably simple techniques led to quality perceptions that are similar or even better than when a complex deep learning mechanism or Spotify's recommendations are used. The simple mechanisms, however, often tend to recommend comparably popular tracks, which can lead to lower discovery effects.
以用户为中心的基于会话的自动化无线电台建议评估
现代流媒体服务的一个共同特点是,给定一个开始项目,自动创建一个几乎无穷无尽的播放列表。当没有关于用户偏好的过去信息可用时,可以使用基于会话的推荐技术来创建这样的播放列表。在这种情况下,推荐仅依赖于开始项目和用户在当前收听会话中的交互,例如“喜欢”或跳过一个项目。近年来,人们提出了各种基于会话的新技术,通常是基于深度学习的。在大多数情况下,对这些方法的评估仅仅基于离线实验和抽象的精度测量。然而,这样的评价不能告诉我们用户所感知到的质量。为了缩小这一研究差距,我们进行了一项用户研究(N=250),其中参与者与自动在线广播电台进行互动。每个治疗组都收到了由五种不同算法之一生成的建议。我们的研究结果表明,相对简单的技术导致的质量感知与使用复杂的深度学习机制或Spotify的推荐时相似甚至更好。然而,简单的机制往往倾向于推荐比较受欢迎的曲目,这可能导致较低的发现效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信