Contributions of KDD to the Knowledge Management Process: a Case Study

Paulo de Tarso Costa de Sousa, H. Prado, E. Moresi, M. Ladeira
{"title":"Contributions of KDD to the Knowledge Management Process: a Case Study","authors":"Paulo de Tarso Costa de Sousa, H. Prado, E. Moresi, M. Ladeira","doi":"10.19153/cleiej.7.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nKnowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD), as any organizational process, is carried out beneath a Knowledge Management (KM) model adopted (even informally) by a corporation. KDD is grossly described in three steps: pre-processing, data mining, and post-processing. The latter is mainly related to the task of transforming in knowledge the patterns issued in the data mining step. On the other hand, KM comprises the following phases, in which knowledge is the subject of the actions: identification of abilities, acquisition, selection and validation, organization and storage, sharing, application, and creation. Although there are many overlaps between KDD and KM, one of them is broadly recognized: the point in which knowledge arises. This paper concerns a study aimed at clarifying relations between the overlapping areas of KDD and knowledge creation, in KM. The work is conducted by means of a case study using the data from the Electoral Court of the Federal District (ECFD), Brazil. The study was developed over a 1.717.000-citizens data set from which data mining models were built by applying algorithms from Weka. It was observed that, although the importance of Information Technology is well recognized in the KM realm, the techniques of KDD deserve a special place in the knowledge creation phase of KM. Moreover, beyond the overlap of post- processing and knowledge creation, other steps of KDD can contribute significantly to KM. An example is the fact that one important decision taken from the ECFD board was taken on the basis of a knowledge acquired from the pre-processing step of KDD. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":418941,"journal":{"name":"CLEI Electron. J.","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLEI Electron. J.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19153/cleiej.7.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD), as any organizational process, is carried out beneath a Knowledge Management (KM) model adopted (even informally) by a corporation. KDD is grossly described in three steps: pre-processing, data mining, and post-processing. The latter is mainly related to the task of transforming in knowledge the patterns issued in the data mining step. On the other hand, KM comprises the following phases, in which knowledge is the subject of the actions: identification of abilities, acquisition, selection and validation, organization and storage, sharing, application, and creation. Although there are many overlaps between KDD and KM, one of them is broadly recognized: the point in which knowledge arises. This paper concerns a study aimed at clarifying relations between the overlapping areas of KDD and knowledge creation, in KM. The work is conducted by means of a case study using the data from the Electoral Court of the Federal District (ECFD), Brazil. The study was developed over a 1.717.000-citizens data set from which data mining models were built by applying algorithms from Weka. It was observed that, although the importance of Information Technology is well recognized in the KM realm, the techniques of KDD deserve a special place in the knowledge creation phase of KM. Moreover, beyond the overlap of post- processing and knowledge creation, other steps of KDD can contribute significantly to KM. An example is the fact that one important decision taken from the ECFD board was taken on the basis of a knowledge acquired from the pre-processing step of KDD.
KDD对知识管理过程的贡献:一个案例研究
与任何组织过程一样,数据库中的知识发现(KDD)是在公司采用的(甚至是非正式的)知识管理(KM)模型下进行的。KDD大致分为三个步骤:预处理、数据挖掘和后处理。后者主要涉及数据挖掘步骤中发布的模式在知识上的转换任务。另一方面,知识管理包括以下阶段,其中知识是行动的主体:识别能力、获取、选择和确认、组织和存储、共享、应用和创造。虽然在KDD和KM之间有许多重叠之处,但其中一个是被广泛认可的:知识产生的点。本文对知识管理中知识开发重叠领域与知识创造之间的关系进行了研究。这项工作是通过使用巴西联邦区选举法院(ECFD)的数据进行案例研究。该研究是在一个171.7万公民的数据集上开发的,数据挖掘模型是通过应用Weka的算法建立的。有人指出,尽管信息技术在知识管理领域的重要性得到了充分认识,但知识开发技术在知识管理的知识创造阶段应该占有特殊的地位。此外,除了后处理和知识创造的重叠之外,知识开发的其他步骤对知识开发也有重要的贡献。一个例子是,从ECFD董事会做出的一个重要决定是基于从KDD的预处理步骤中获得的知识做出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信