SHOULD ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTEGRATE WITH DENTAL EDUCATION? AN ASSESSMENT THROUGH THE DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY PERSPECTIVE

Cansu Buyuk
{"title":"SHOULD ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTEGRATE WITH DENTAL EDUCATION? AN ASSESSMENT THROUGH THE DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY PERSPECTIVE","authors":"Cansu Buyuk","doi":"10.19177/JRD.V9E120216-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The requirement to adapt dentistry education to the growing knowledge and big data is evident. Future dentists will participate in AI studies as both researchers and users. The main aim was to evaluate the attitudes of undergraduate dental students on artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Secondarily, it was aimed to discuss possible solutions for the integration of AI into education in particular to dentomaxillofacial radiology. Material and Method: A written survey included 16 questions with a 5-point Likert-scale was designed. The content of the survey included basic knowledge about AI terminology, applications on dentomaxillofacial radiology, and future estimations. One hundred seventy-six students attending the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades were included. The attitudes of the students were assessed with the total score. The responses were scored as: Strongly disagree: 1, Disagree: 2, Neutral: 3, Agree: 4, Strongly agree: 5. The minimum and maximum possible points were 16 and 80, and 48 was the middle score. The scores were classified as 16-31 (group 1), 32-47 (group 2), 48-63 (group 3), and 64-80 (group 4). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was used to test the internal consistency of the questions. One-way analysis of variance and Chi-square test were used to compare normally distributed data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the that did not show normal distribution. Statistical significance was evaluated with a 5% Type-I error level. Results: The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was 0.849. The response rate of the participants was 83.41% (n=176). The mean total scale score was 57.68 ± 0.651. Group 3 had the largest cluster (67.61%; n=119), whereas the group 1 had the smallest (0.56%; n=1). The total scale score showed no statistically significant difference between the academic years. Conclusion: The attitudes of undergraduate dental students on AI were positive and students are aware of the potential of applications in the field. The conventional dentomaxillofacial radiology curriculum requires an","PeriodicalId":213881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19177/JRD.V9E120216-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: The requirement to adapt dentistry education to the growing knowledge and big data is evident. Future dentists will participate in AI studies as both researchers and users. The main aim was to evaluate the attitudes of undergraduate dental students on artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Secondarily, it was aimed to discuss possible solutions for the integration of AI into education in particular to dentomaxillofacial radiology. Material and Method: A written survey included 16 questions with a 5-point Likert-scale was designed. The content of the survey included basic knowledge about AI terminology, applications on dentomaxillofacial radiology, and future estimations. One hundred seventy-six students attending the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades were included. The attitudes of the students were assessed with the total score. The responses were scored as: Strongly disagree: 1, Disagree: 2, Neutral: 3, Agree: 4, Strongly agree: 5. The minimum and maximum possible points were 16 and 80, and 48 was the middle score. The scores were classified as 16-31 (group 1), 32-47 (group 2), 48-63 (group 3), and 64-80 (group 4). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was used to test the internal consistency of the questions. One-way analysis of variance and Chi-square test were used to compare normally distributed data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the that did not show normal distribution. Statistical significance was evaluated with a 5% Type-I error level. Results: The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was 0.849. The response rate of the participants was 83.41% (n=176). The mean total scale score was 57.68 ± 0.651. Group 3 had the largest cluster (67.61%; n=119), whereas the group 1 had the smallest (0.56%; n=1). The total scale score showed no statistically significant difference between the academic years. Conclusion: The attitudes of undergraduate dental students on AI were positive and students are aware of the potential of applications in the field. The conventional dentomaxillofacial radiology curriculum requires an
人工智能是否应该与牙科教育相结合?从牙颌面放射学角度评价
导读:牙科教育需要适应不断增长的知识和大数据。未来的牙医将以研究者和使用者的身份参与人工智能研究。主要目的是评估牙科本科生对人工智能(AI)应用的态度。其次,它旨在讨论将人工智能整合到教育中的可能解决方案,特别是牙颌面放射学。材料与方法:设计了一份包括16个问题的5分李克特量表的书面调查。调查内容包括人工智能术语的基本知识、在牙颌面放射学上的应用以及对未来的预测。176名三年级、四年级和五年级的学生被包括在内。以总分来评估学生的态度。回答的得分为:非常不同意:1分,不同意:2分,中性:3分,同意:4分,非常同意:5分。最低分和最高分分别为16分和80分,中间分为48分。得分分为16-31分(第1组)、32-47分(第2组)、48-63分(第3组)和64-80分(第4组)。采用Cronbach's alpha信度系数检验问题的内部一致性。正态分布资料的比较采用单因素方差分析和卡方检验。Mann-Whitney U检验用于比较非正态分布。以5%的i型误差水平评价统计学显著性。结果:Cronbach's α信度系数为0.849。问卷调查的应答率为83.41% (n=176)。量表平均总分为57.68±0.651分。第3组聚类最多(67.61%);N =119),而组1最小(0.56%;n = 1)。各学年总量表得分差异无统计学意义。结论:牙科本科学生对人工智能的态度是积极的,学生意识到人工智能在该领域的应用潜力。传统的牙颌面放射学课程要求
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信