Diagnosis of Communication Disorders

R. V. Van Hattum
{"title":"Diagnosis of Communication Disorders","authors":"R. V. Van Hattum","doi":"10.1055/s-0028-1095004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ion as possible should be used; those close to the \"thing-level,\" as descriptive and removed from speculation and interpretive implications as possible. 4 DIAGNOSIS OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS-VAN HATTUM 3. Choose the most simple explanation that fits the facts — the simplest explanation consistent with the observed phenomenon is the most likely correct one. 4. Keep conclusions tentative rather than absolute—the tests administered and the history information represent finite samples of behavior. It is not always possible to arrive at ultimate clarification of the problem and it is often necessary to work from hypotheses. 5. Respect the relevance of norms — deviant behavior suggests variance from normal and, thus, a knowledge of \"normal\" is imperative. 6. Seek the counsel of other professionals — no one professional has all the answers — seek cooperative relationships. D E F I N I N G C O M M U N I C A T I O N","PeriodicalId":364385,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1095004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ion as possible should be used; those close to the "thing-level," as descriptive and removed from speculation and interpretive implications as possible. 4 DIAGNOSIS OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS-VAN HATTUM 3. Choose the most simple explanation that fits the facts — the simplest explanation consistent with the observed phenomenon is the most likely correct one. 4. Keep conclusions tentative rather than absolute—the tests administered and the history information represent finite samples of behavior. It is not always possible to arrive at ultimate clarification of the problem and it is often necessary to work from hypotheses. 5. Respect the relevance of norms — deviant behavior suggests variance from normal and, thus, a knowledge of "normal" is imperative. 6. Seek the counsel of other professionals — no one professional has all the answers — seek cooperative relationships. D E F I N I N G C O M M U N I C A T I O N
沟通障碍的诊断
应尽可能使用离子;那些接近“事物层面”的,尽可能描述性的,远离推测和解释的含义。交际障碍的诊断——van hattum;选择符合事实的最简单的解释——与观察到的现象相一致的最简单的解释最有可能是正确的。4. 保持结论的试探性,而不是绝对的——进行的测试和历史信息代表有限的行为样本。对问题的最终澄清并不总是可能的,常常需要从假设出发。5. 尊重规范的相关性-异常行为表明与正常的差异,因此,了解“正常”是必要的。6. 寻求其他专业人士的建议——没有一个专业人士有所有的答案——寻求合作关系。如果我不喜欢,我就不喜欢,我就不喜欢
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信