Governance Trends among European Union Countries: Is There Institutional Convergence?

V. Vučković, Ružica Šimić Banović, Martina Basarac Sertić
{"title":"Governance Trends among European Union Countries: Is There Institutional Convergence?","authors":"V. Vučković, Ružica Šimić Banović, Martina Basarac Sertić","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3528519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is twofold. First, to review the existing body of knowledge dealing with the questionable convergence of Eastern European countries as a possible consequence of both the transfer of selected Western formal institutions to those countries and the adoption of the acquis communautaire. It is an issue dating back to the beginning of 1990s when the predominant expectation was that successful formal institutions in Western countries would yield the same results in transitional countries. Using the descriptive statistics, we show that this is a misconception and that it is highly unlikely that Mediterranean and CEE countries will catch up with the three leading groups (Liberal, Nordic and Continental countries) in the coming decades. Next, we focused on quantitative analysis of sigma and beta convergence based on governance trends in the EU in the last two decades. The obtained results also demonstrate rather divergent paths, with Liberal, Nordic and Continental countries performing much better than Mediterranean and CEE countries.","PeriodicalId":330992,"journal":{"name":"New Institutional Economics eJournal","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Institutional Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3528519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this paper is twofold. First, to review the existing body of knowledge dealing with the questionable convergence of Eastern European countries as a possible consequence of both the transfer of selected Western formal institutions to those countries and the adoption of the acquis communautaire. It is an issue dating back to the beginning of 1990s when the predominant expectation was that successful formal institutions in Western countries would yield the same results in transitional countries. Using the descriptive statistics, we show that this is a misconception and that it is highly unlikely that Mediterranean and CEE countries will catch up with the three leading groups (Liberal, Nordic and Continental countries) in the coming decades. Next, we focused on quantitative analysis of sigma and beta convergence based on governance trends in the EU in the last two decades. The obtained results also demonstrate rather divergent paths, with Liberal, Nordic and Continental countries performing much better than Mediterranean and CEE countries.
欧盟国家治理趋势:是否存在制度趋同?
本文的目的有两个。第一,审查处理东欧国家有问题的趋同现象的现有知识体系,这种趋同现象是某些西方正式机构向这些国家转移和采用共同性制度的可能后果。这个问题可以追溯到20世纪90年代初,当时的主流预期是,西方国家成功的正式制度将在转型国家产生同样的结果。使用描述性统计数据,我们表明这是一种误解,地中海和中东欧国家在未来几十年内不太可能赶上三大领先集团(自由、北欧和大陆国家)。接下来,我们将重点放在基于欧盟过去二十年治理趋势的sigma和beta趋同的定量分析上。获得的结果也显示出相当不同的路径,自由、北欧和大陆国家比地中海和中东欧国家表现得好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信