Morality in politics: Zhao Tingyang’s political philosophy

Shuchun Zhang
{"title":"Morality in politics: Zhao Tingyang’s political philosophy","authors":"Shuchun Zhang","doi":"10.22394/1996-0522-2022-3-37-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article aims at presenting the system proposed by the modern Chinese philoso- pher Zhao Tingyang towards political realities. Scientific novelty. Due to the lack of translations of Zhao’s works into Russian, Russian science has extremely limited understanding of his theory and the modern Chinese philosophy in general. The article is one of the first attempts to present Zhao’s main thoughts on political philosophy in Russian on the basis of original texts. Results. Following the ancient Chinese theorists, Zhao regards the need to cooperate as the reason of the beginning of politics and suggests studying the world based on a broader scale “Tianxia” (‘All under Heaven’). Zhao’s theory of the initial form of politics called the “Xunzi-Hobbes Hypothesis” combines Hobbes’ idea about individual conflicts and the principle of coexistence which is typical for Eastern philosophy. According to Zhao, “Tianxia” as an ideal political regime is also set as the starting point of the political templation (Tianxia > State > Family > Individual). While criticising Confucianism for its impracticality in solving political issues, Zhao suggests that the only regime where its members prefer morality is when it is a prerequisite for ob- taining greater benefits. Conclusions. Zhao’s political philosophy offers a pragmatic approach to deal with the ethical issues in politics. We concluded that in the ideal regime proposed by Zhao, morality functions rather as a tool to achieve more benefits and ceases to be a universal law. A comparative analysis led to the conclusion that his approach to morality in politics is comparable to that of N. Machiavelli, for whom the practical significance of any means can domi- nate abstract values.","PeriodicalId":403043,"journal":{"name":"Socium i vlast","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socium i vlast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2022-3-37-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article aims at presenting the system proposed by the modern Chinese philoso- pher Zhao Tingyang towards political realities. Scientific novelty. Due to the lack of translations of Zhao’s works into Russian, Russian science has extremely limited understanding of his theory and the modern Chinese philosophy in general. The article is one of the first attempts to present Zhao’s main thoughts on political philosophy in Russian on the basis of original texts. Results. Following the ancient Chinese theorists, Zhao regards the need to cooperate as the reason of the beginning of politics and suggests studying the world based on a broader scale “Tianxia” (‘All under Heaven’). Zhao’s theory of the initial form of politics called the “Xunzi-Hobbes Hypothesis” combines Hobbes’ idea about individual conflicts and the principle of coexistence which is typical for Eastern philosophy. According to Zhao, “Tianxia” as an ideal political regime is also set as the starting point of the political templation (Tianxia > State > Family > Individual). While criticising Confucianism for its impracticality in solving political issues, Zhao suggests that the only regime where its members prefer morality is when it is a prerequisite for ob- taining greater benefits. Conclusions. Zhao’s political philosophy offers a pragmatic approach to deal with the ethical issues in politics. We concluded that in the ideal regime proposed by Zhao, morality functions rather as a tool to achieve more benefits and ceases to be a universal law. A comparative analysis led to the conclusion that his approach to morality in politics is comparable to that of N. Machiavelli, for whom the practical significance of any means can domi- nate abstract values.
政治中的道德:赵廷阳的政治哲学
介绍。本文旨在介绍中国近代哲学家赵廷阳针对政治现实所提出的制度。科学的新奇。由于缺乏对他的著作的俄文翻译,俄罗斯科学界对他的理论和中国现代哲学的理解极为有限。本文是第一次尝试在原文的基础上用俄文呈现赵的主要政治哲学思想。结果。按照中国古代理论家的观点,赵认为合作的需要是政治开始的原因,并建议在更广泛的“天下”(“天下”)的基础上研究世界。赵的政治初始形态理论被称为“荀子-霍布斯假说”,它结合了霍布斯的个体冲突思想和东方哲学中典型的共存原则。赵认为,“天下”作为一种理想的政治制度,也被设定为政治模板的起点(天下>国家>家庭>个人)。在批评儒家思想在解决政治问题上不切实际的同时,赵认为,只有当道德是获得更大利益的先决条件时,其成员才会更喜欢道德。结论。赵的政治哲学为处理政治伦理问题提供了一种实用主义的途径。我们得出的结论是,在赵所提出的理想政体中,道德与其说是一种获得更多利益的工具,不如说是一种普遍规律。一项比较分析得出结论,他的政治道德方法可与马基雅维利相媲美,对马基雅维利来说,任何手段的实际意义都可以支配抽象价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信