Performance Evaluation of different Algorithms for Crack Detection in Concrete Structures

Luqman Ali, S. Harous, N. Zaki, Wasif Khan, F. Alnajjar, Hamad Al Jassmi
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of different Algorithms for Crack Detection in Concrete Structures","authors":"Luqman Ali, S. Harous, N. Zaki, Wasif Khan, F. Alnajjar, Hamad Al Jassmi","doi":"10.1109/iccakm50778.2021.9357717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detection of cracks at the earliest stage is crucial, as these are the primary indicators of infrastructure's health. Manual inspection is often carried out for infrastructure inspection which requires in-depth knowledge of domain, which is time-consuming, labor intensive. The in-accessibility of infrastructure in manual inspection make it more challenging and complex. Therefore, various efficient and fast image-based automatic techniques have been introduced in the literature for concrete crack detection task. This paper aims to evaluate the performance six hand-crafted features based traditional approaches in comparison with deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN's) for concrete crack detection using different performance metrics. The dataset is obtained by combing data from two publicly available datasets and consists of 40000 crack and non-crack images. Extensive experiments are conducted demonstrating that Random Forest and KNN classifier performs better with 98% accuracy with Area Under the Curve 0.99 as compared to the other classifiers using handcrafted features as well it is faster than deep convolutional neural networks. The computational time for the DCNN is larger than all other classifier but it has the capability to extract feature from images automatically.","PeriodicalId":165854,"journal":{"name":"2021 2nd International Conference on Computation, Automation and Knowledge Management (ICCAKM)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 2nd International Conference on Computation, Automation and Knowledge Management (ICCAKM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iccakm50778.2021.9357717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Detection of cracks at the earliest stage is crucial, as these are the primary indicators of infrastructure's health. Manual inspection is often carried out for infrastructure inspection which requires in-depth knowledge of domain, which is time-consuming, labor intensive. The in-accessibility of infrastructure in manual inspection make it more challenging and complex. Therefore, various efficient and fast image-based automatic techniques have been introduced in the literature for concrete crack detection task. This paper aims to evaluate the performance six hand-crafted features based traditional approaches in comparison with deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN's) for concrete crack detection using different performance metrics. The dataset is obtained by combing data from two publicly available datasets and consists of 40000 crack and non-crack images. Extensive experiments are conducted demonstrating that Random Forest and KNN classifier performs better with 98% accuracy with Area Under the Curve 0.99 as compared to the other classifiers using handcrafted features as well it is faster than deep convolutional neural networks. The computational time for the DCNN is larger than all other classifier but it has the capability to extract feature from images automatically.
混凝土结构裂缝检测不同算法的性能评价
在早期阶段发现裂缝至关重要,因为这是基础设施健康状况的主要指标。基础设施巡检通常采用人工巡检,需要深入的领域知识,耗时长,劳动强度大。人工检测中基础设施的不可访问性使其更具挑战性和复杂性。因此,文献中引入了各种高效、快速的基于图像的混凝土裂缝自动检测技术。本文旨在评估六种基于手工特征的传统方法的性能,并将其与使用不同性能指标的深度卷积神经网络(CNN)进行比较。该数据集是通过对两个公开数据集的数据进行梳理得到的,由40000张裂纹和非裂纹图像组成。大量的实验表明,与使用手工特征的其他分类器相比,随机森林和KNN分类器在曲线下面积0.99的情况下表现更好,准确率达到98%,并且比深度卷积神经网络更快。DCNN的计算时间比其他分类器大,但具有自动提取图像特征的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信