Ronald K. Mitchell, Bradley R. Agle, J. R. Mitchell
{"title":"Pathways in Stakeholder Research","authors":"Ronald K. Mitchell, Bradley R. Agle, J. R. Mitchell","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stakeholder-focused research seeks to explain relationships among firms and stakeholders, using approaches that predominantly follow normative, instrumental, or descriptive pathways. Following circulation of the 1963 Stanford Memo and the 1984 publication of Freeman, the stakeholder perspective has become a sizable area of research in diverse fields, with growing influence in the business community as indicated in 2019 by the commitment of the US Business Roundtable to stakeholder principles. Still, the tendency to offer stakeholder theory as a replacement for neoclassical theories of the firm somewhat limits its adoption. An approach more likely to advance the trend toward an increasing stakeholder orientation is one of theory collaboration, in which researchers explore how self-interested action in the market system can be tempered by others-interested action. To this aim, the three stakeholder research pathways might be extended, as follows: (a) adding a moral and ethical leadership component to normative stakeholder theory research to move from a philosophy-centric literature toward one that better explains the how and why of normatively based actions toward stakeholders; (b) adopting a stakeholder-work-focused approach to instrumental stakeholder theory research to afford it the benefits of moral neutrality; and (c) returning the focus of descriptive stakeholder theory research to stakeholders as “natural persons,” as compared to corporations as “juristic persons.” With these extensions, scholars can encourage the ongoing reorientation in society toward the stakeholders of firms.","PeriodicalId":294617,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Stakeholder-focused research seeks to explain relationships among firms and stakeholders, using approaches that predominantly follow normative, instrumental, or descriptive pathways. Following circulation of the 1963 Stanford Memo and the 1984 publication of Freeman, the stakeholder perspective has become a sizable area of research in diverse fields, with growing influence in the business community as indicated in 2019 by the commitment of the US Business Roundtable to stakeholder principles. Still, the tendency to offer stakeholder theory as a replacement for neoclassical theories of the firm somewhat limits its adoption. An approach more likely to advance the trend toward an increasing stakeholder orientation is one of theory collaboration, in which researchers explore how self-interested action in the market system can be tempered by others-interested action. To this aim, the three stakeholder research pathways might be extended, as follows: (a) adding a moral and ethical leadership component to normative stakeholder theory research to move from a philosophy-centric literature toward one that better explains the how and why of normatively based actions toward stakeholders; (b) adopting a stakeholder-work-focused approach to instrumental stakeholder theory research to afford it the benefits of moral neutrality; and (c) returning the focus of descriptive stakeholder theory research to stakeholders as “natural persons,” as compared to corporations as “juristic persons.” With these extensions, scholars can encourage the ongoing reorientation in society toward the stakeholders of firms.
以利益相关者为中心的研究试图解释公司和利益相关者之间的关系,使用主要遵循规范性,工具性或描述性途径的方法。继1963年斯坦福备忘录(Stanford Memo)和1984年弗里曼(Freeman)的出版之后,利益相关者视角已成为各个领域的一个相当大的研究领域,正如2019年美国商业圆桌会议(US business Roundtable)对利益相关者原则的承诺所表明的那样,利益相关者视角在商界的影响力越来越大。尽管如此,将利益相关者理论作为新古典企业理论的替代品的倾向在某种程度上限制了它的采用。一种更有可能推动利益相关者取向趋势的方法是理论合作,其中研究人员探索市场体系中的自利行为如何被他人利益行为所缓和。为此,三种利益相关者研究路径可以扩展如下:(a)在规范性利益相关者理论研究中增加道德和伦理领导成分,从以哲学为中心的文献转向更好地解释如何以及为什么对利益相关者采取规范性行动的文献;(b)对工具性利益相关者理论研究采取以利益相关者工作为中心的方法,使其具有道德中立的好处;(c)将描述性利益相关者理论研究的重点回归到作为“自然人”的利益相关者,而不是作为“法人”的公司。有了这些延伸,学者们可以鼓励社会对企业利益相关者的重新定位。