LESS

L. Liu, Jun Xu, Mohit Singh
{"title":"LESS","authors":"L. Liu, Jun Xu, Mohit Singh","doi":"10.1145/3344341.3368807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since about 1950 the inflow of the San Joaquin River to the Delta has been, and still is being greatly reduced. There are long periods when there is no net outflow from the river to the Central -Delta (WRINT-SDWA 19). This causes stagnant water reaches with loss of salinity control and inadequate dissolved oxygen for fish. Upstream appropriative rights granted by the State Board often exceed the total yield of the river system, and direct diversion rights are based on diversion amounts rather than on consumptive use. Appropriators, therefore, are able to keep increasing their consumptive use of the water they divert with a consequent reduction in return flows. Exports from the Tuolumne River to the Bay Area bypass the stream system and have increased about five fold over the last forty years. SDWA 121 shows the effects of some of these diversions on the Delta in a dry year such as 1977. Appropriators on the tributaries with junior water rights have not been required to bypass sufficient unimpaired flows to protect senior water rights and natural channel depletions in the San Joaquin River and southern Delta. The net effect of CVP operations alone is to reduce river flow upstream of Vernalis by about 130,000 acre feet in dry years and 560,000 acre feet in below normal years. This is discussed in the June 1980 joint report by USBR and SDWA on \"The Effects of the CVP Upon The Southern Delta Water Supply\". That report was submitted in Phase I of the Delta Hearings as SDWA 4 and a graph depicting those effects is at SDWA 26.","PeriodicalId":261870,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing","volume":"269 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3344341.3368807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Since about 1950 the inflow of the San Joaquin River to the Delta has been, and still is being greatly reduced. There are long periods when there is no net outflow from the river to the Central -Delta (WRINT-SDWA 19). This causes stagnant water reaches with loss of salinity control and inadequate dissolved oxygen for fish. Upstream appropriative rights granted by the State Board often exceed the total yield of the river system, and direct diversion rights are based on diversion amounts rather than on consumptive use. Appropriators, therefore, are able to keep increasing their consumptive use of the water they divert with a consequent reduction in return flows. Exports from the Tuolumne River to the Bay Area bypass the stream system and have increased about five fold over the last forty years. SDWA 121 shows the effects of some of these diversions on the Delta in a dry year such as 1977. Appropriators on the tributaries with junior water rights have not been required to bypass sufficient unimpaired flows to protect senior water rights and natural channel depletions in the San Joaquin River and southern Delta. The net effect of CVP operations alone is to reduce river flow upstream of Vernalis by about 130,000 acre feet in dry years and 560,000 acre feet in below normal years. This is discussed in the June 1980 joint report by USBR and SDWA on "The Effects of the CVP Upon The Southern Delta Water Supply". That report was submitted in Phase I of the Delta Hearings as SDWA 4 and a graph depicting those effects is at SDWA 26.
大约自1950年以来,圣华金河流入三角洲的水量已经大大减少,而且还在继续减少。有很长一段时间,河流没有净流出到中部三角洲(WRINT-SDWA 19)。这会导致死水,失去盐度控制,鱼类的溶解氧不足。国务院授予的上游专有权往往超过水系的总水量,而直接调水权是基于调水量而非消耗量。因此,拨款者能够不断增加他们引开的水的消费使用,从而减少回流。从图勒米河到湾区的出口绕过了河流系统,在过去的四十年里增长了大约五倍。SDWA 121显示了在干旱年份(如1977年),其中一些改道对三角洲的影响。拥有初级水权的支流上的拨款人没有被要求绕过足够的未受损害的水流,以保护高级水权和圣华金河和南部三角洲的自然水道枯竭。仅CVP操作的净影响是,在干旱年份,Vernalis上游的河流流量减少了约13万英亩英尺,在干旱年份减少了56万英亩英尺。这在1980年6月USBR和SDWA关于“CVP对南部三角洲供水的影响”的联合报告中进行了讨论。该报告是在三角洲听证会的第一阶段提交的,作为SDWA 4,而描绘这些影响的图表是在SDWA 26。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信