Standards and innovation in technological dynamics

ACM Stand. Pub Date : 1998-06-01 DOI:10.1145/301688.301692
D. Foray
{"title":"Standards and innovation in technological dynamics","authors":"D. Foray","doi":"10.1145/301688.301692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"· I f the wor ld of industry h a d only one s ingle system, wi th one s e t of standards, d imensions, ru les , and techniques, i t w o u l d be eas ie r , cheaper , and faster to handle the progress of any project. However, if that w e r e the case, any shortcoming in this system would h i n d e r the progress of projects made in response to the evolving wor ld of industry. In short, var ie ty i s not only the spice of l ife but also the immunity that any system, not only industrial, should have to ensure survival. But var ie ty i s e x p e n s i v e to maintain and track. I s there a trade-off? Definitely. What is the trade-off that w i l l guarantee maximal performance both spatially and temporal ly? e know that standardization--i.e., unification, simplification and consistency of technique--always accompanies the installation of a new technical system. It was tree during the start of the \"American system of manufacture,\" which was based on the design of standardized machines; it was true during the installation of the modern technical system based on the availability of electricity; and, it is still true today with the intense standardization that accompanies the production and diffusion of new information technologies. Powerful standardization almost certainly represents a change of technological system. It is interesting to reflect on this paradox, generated today by coincidence between the increasingly standardized nature of production, exchange, and consumption and the advent of an economy within which innovation, learning, and change are becoming predominant. How to explain this concomitance between two apparently contradictory logics: that of freedom, creativity, and dynamics related to innovation and that of stability, order, and routine associated with standardization? In this paper, w e will explain first of all that the coincidence of standardization and innovation is not at all paradoxical. In fact, fast-changing economies have a greater need for standards and norms. We will then very quickly develop the concept of \"fast change,\" to explain the new economic mode, and finally, describe some components of the complementarity of standardization and innovation.","PeriodicalId":270594,"journal":{"name":"ACM Stand.","volume":"341 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Stand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/301688.301692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

· I f the wor ld of industry h a d only one s ingle system, wi th one s e t of standards, d imensions, ru les , and techniques, i t w o u l d be eas ie r , cheaper , and faster to handle the progress of any project. However, if that w e r e the case, any shortcoming in this system would h i n d e r the progress of projects made in response to the evolving wor ld of industry. In short, var ie ty i s not only the spice of l ife but also the immunity that any system, not only industrial, should have to ensure survival. But var ie ty i s e x p e n s i v e to maintain and track. I s there a trade-off? Definitely. What is the trade-off that w i l l guarantee maximal performance both spatially and temporal ly? e know that standardization--i.e., unification, simplification and consistency of technique--always accompanies the installation of a new technical system. It was tree during the start of the "American system of manufacture," which was based on the design of standardized machines; it was true during the installation of the modern technical system based on the availability of electricity; and, it is still true today with the intense standardization that accompanies the production and diffusion of new information technologies. Powerful standardization almost certainly represents a change of technological system. It is interesting to reflect on this paradox, generated today by coincidence between the increasingly standardized nature of production, exchange, and consumption and the advent of an economy within which innovation, learning, and change are becoming predominant. How to explain this concomitance between two apparently contradictory logics: that of freedom, creativity, and dynamics related to innovation and that of stability, order, and routine associated with standardization? In this paper, w e will explain first of all that the coincidence of standardization and innovation is not at all paradoxical. In fact, fast-changing economies have a greater need for standards and norms. We will then very quickly develop the concept of "fast change," to explain the new economic mode, and finally, describe some components of the complementarity of standardization and innovation.
技术动态中的标准和创新
·如果工业世界只有一个单一的系统,有一个统一的标准、尺寸、规则和技术,那么你将更容易、更便宜、更快速地处理任何项目的进度。然而,如果是这样的话,这个系统的任何缺点都将影响到项目的进展,这些项目是为了响应不断变化的工业世界而进行的。简而言之,它不仅是生活的调味品,也是任何系统(不仅是工业系统)都应该确保生存的免疫力。但是我想说的是,这是一项非常重要的工作,它需要维护和跟踪。这是一种权衡吗?肯定。在空间和时间上保证最大性能的权衡是什么?我们知道标准化——即。技术的统一、简化和一致性——总是伴随着新技术系统的安装。在以标准化机器设计为基础的“美国制造体系”开始时,它是一棵树;在安装以电力供应为基础的现代技术系统期间,情况确实如此;今天,随着新信息技术的生产和传播,标准化程度越来越高,这一点仍然正确。强有力的标准化几乎肯定代表着技术体系的变革。反思这个悖论是很有趣的。今天,由于生产、交换和消费日益标准化的本质与创新、学习和变革成为主导的经济的出现之间的巧合,产生了这个悖论。如何解释两种明显矛盾的逻辑之间的共存:与创新相关的自由、创造力和动态,以及与标准化相关的稳定、秩序和常规?在本文中,我们将首先解释标准化与创新的巧合并非完全矛盾。事实上,快速变化的经济体更需要标准和规范。然后,我们将很快发展“快速变化”的概念,以解释新的经济模式,最后,描述标准化和创新互补的一些组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信