Long-term Non-invasive Hemodynamic Evaluation of Left Endocardial Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

M. C. Carrero, G. D. Babio, G. Masson, I. Constantin, F. Verón, M. Mezzadra, G. V. Janavel, P. Stutzbach
{"title":"Long-term Non-invasive Hemodynamic Evaluation of Left Endocardial Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy","authors":"M. C. Carrero, G. D. Babio, G. Masson, I. Constantin, F. Verón, M. Mezzadra, G. V. Janavel, P. Stutzbach","doi":"10.7775/RAC.87.6.16591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy has 25% to 30% rate of “non-responder” patients. Endocardial cardiac resynchronizationtherapy (eCRT), in which the left ventricular catheter is implanted in the endocardium, would be an alternativefor these patients; however, its long-term outcome has not been investigated.Objectives: The aim of this study was the long-term non-invasive hemodynamic evaluation of eCRT in clinical responders.Methods: Patients implanted according to the criteria for resynchronization, using the Jurdham technique, with more than 6months after the implant, were included in the study. All were clinical responders. The hemodynamic response was evaluatedwith a cardiac function analyzer, which measures the left ventricular systolic intervals (preejection and ejection periods) andautomatically calculates an index of systolic function and estimates the ejection fraction (Systocor mod IS100). To assess themechanical efficacy of eCRT, the cardiac function during biventricular mode was compared with left bundle branch block(LBBB), either spontaneous or by single stimulation of the right ventricle, with patients as their own controls. At least 20beats were averaged in each stimulation mode and only changes >1% with p <0.01 were considered as clinically relevantand statistically significant.Results: Seventeen patients were included, with a median follow-up of 43 months, (9 to 78 months). Endocardial resynchronization,compared with LBBB ventricular activation, showed that all patients shortened the preejection period by an average of31 ms (15%), indicative of decreased interventricular dyssynchrony caused by LBBB. In all patients, systolic function indexincreased by 0.3 (23%) and the EF by 8.3%. In 12/17 of cases (71%) the ejective period increased on average 8.7 ms (2.9%),suggesting an increase in systolic volume. In all changes p was <0.01.Conclusions: Endocardial resynchronization therapy offers significant long-term hemodynamic improvement, detected bysystolic intervals.","PeriodicalId":447734,"journal":{"name":"Argentine Journal of Cardiology","volume":"42 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argentine Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7775/RAC.87.6.16591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy has 25% to 30% rate of “non-responder” patients. Endocardial cardiac resynchronizationtherapy (eCRT), in which the left ventricular catheter is implanted in the endocardium, would be an alternativefor these patients; however, its long-term outcome has not been investigated.Objectives: The aim of this study was the long-term non-invasive hemodynamic evaluation of eCRT in clinical responders.Methods: Patients implanted according to the criteria for resynchronization, using the Jurdham technique, with more than 6months after the implant, were included in the study. All were clinical responders. The hemodynamic response was evaluatedwith a cardiac function analyzer, which measures the left ventricular systolic intervals (preejection and ejection periods) andautomatically calculates an index of systolic function and estimates the ejection fraction (Systocor mod IS100). To assess themechanical efficacy of eCRT, the cardiac function during biventricular mode was compared with left bundle branch block(LBBB), either spontaneous or by single stimulation of the right ventricle, with patients as their own controls. At least 20beats were averaged in each stimulation mode and only changes >1% with p <0.01 were considered as clinically relevantand statistically significant.Results: Seventeen patients were included, with a median follow-up of 43 months, (9 to 78 months). Endocardial resynchronization,compared with LBBB ventricular activation, showed that all patients shortened the preejection period by an average of31 ms (15%), indicative of decreased interventricular dyssynchrony caused by LBBB. In all patients, systolic function indexincreased by 0.3 (23%) and the EF by 8.3%. In 12/17 of cases (71%) the ejective period increased on average 8.7 ms (2.9%),suggesting an increase in systolic volume. In all changes p was <0.01.Conclusions: Endocardial resynchronization therapy offers significant long-term hemodynamic improvement, detected bysystolic intervals.
左心内膜心脏再同步化治疗的长期无创血流动力学评价
背景:心脏再同步化治疗有25% - 30%的患者“无反应”。心内膜心脏再同步化治疗(eCRT),将左心室导管植入心内膜,将是这些患者的另一种选择;然而,其长期效果尚未调查。目的:本研究的目的是对临床应答者进行eCRT的长期无创血流动力学评估。方法:采用Jurdham技术,按照再同步标准种植,种植后6个月以上的患者纳入研究。所有患者均为临床应答者。用心功能分析仪评估血流动力学反应,测量左心室收缩间隔(射血前期和射血期),并自动计算收缩功能指数和估计射血分数(Systocor mod IS100)。为了评估eCRT的力学效果,将双心室模式下的心功能与左束支阻滞(LBBB)进行比较,无论是自发的还是单次刺激右心室,患者作为自己的对照。在每种刺激模式下平均至少20次心跳,只有变化>1%且p <0.01被认为具有临床相关性和统计学意义。结果:纳入17例患者,中位随访时间为43个月(9 ~ 78个月)。与LBBB心室激活相比,心内膜再同步化显示,所有患者射血前期平均缩短31 ms(15%),表明LBBB引起的室间非同步化减少。在所有患者中,收缩功能指数增加0.3 (23%),EF增加8.3%。12/17的病例(71%)射血时间平均增加8.7 ms(2.9%),提示收缩容量增加。p <0.01。结论:心内膜再同步化治疗可通过收缩间期检测到显著的长期血流动力学改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信