{"title":"European Union integration and the belt and road initiative: A curious case of Serbia","authors":"M. Vucic","doi":"10.2298/medjp2002337v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of this article is the Serbian foreign policy between its main\n strategic aims - membership in the European Union, and cooperation with\n China in the framework of the Belt and Road initiative. Serbia bases its\n foreign policy upon four pillars - the accession process to the EU and three\n strategic partnerships with great world powers - China, the United States of\n America, and Russia. However, the accession process to the EU requires from\n Serbia to strictly follow its obligations from the Stabilization and\n Association Agreement, Treaty Establishing the Transport Community, and\n other treaties signed with the EU which might sometimes conflict with\n project activities from the Belt and Road partnership process. These\n obligations relate mostly to competition and environmental protection. The\n author gives the analysis of the main points of possible conflict and\n indicates a double standard in the EU approach to the Belt and Road\n initiative. Then he presents arguments that indicate the Belt and Road can\n serve as a bridge between candidate countries and the EU internal market.\n The author concludes that although there exist some structural\n justifications to EU?s skepticism towards the Belt and Road, the best way to\n overcome them is to insist on political dialogue on many existing levels\n between the EU and China, with the aim to exchange information between them\n on EU rules, policies and standards to make sure Chinese investments and\n other financial activities in Serbia are in accordance with its accession\n obligations.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"326 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2002337v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The topic of this article is the Serbian foreign policy between its main
strategic aims - membership in the European Union, and cooperation with
China in the framework of the Belt and Road initiative. Serbia bases its
foreign policy upon four pillars - the accession process to the EU and three
strategic partnerships with great world powers - China, the United States of
America, and Russia. However, the accession process to the EU requires from
Serbia to strictly follow its obligations from the Stabilization and
Association Agreement, Treaty Establishing the Transport Community, and
other treaties signed with the EU which might sometimes conflict with
project activities from the Belt and Road partnership process. These
obligations relate mostly to competition and environmental protection. The
author gives the analysis of the main points of possible conflict and
indicates a double standard in the EU approach to the Belt and Road
initiative. Then he presents arguments that indicate the Belt and Road can
serve as a bridge between candidate countries and the EU internal market.
The author concludes that although there exist some structural
justifications to EU?s skepticism towards the Belt and Road, the best way to
overcome them is to insist on political dialogue on many existing levels
between the EU and China, with the aim to exchange information between them
on EU rules, policies and standards to make sure Chinese investments and
other financial activities in Serbia are in accordance with its accession
obligations.