European Union integration and the belt and road initiative: A curious case of Serbia

M. Vucic
{"title":"European Union integration and the belt and road initiative: A curious case of Serbia","authors":"M. Vucic","doi":"10.2298/medjp2002337v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of this article is the Serbian foreign policy between its main\n strategic aims - membership in the European Union, and cooperation with\n China in the framework of the Belt and Road initiative. Serbia bases its\n foreign policy upon four pillars - the accession process to the EU and three\n strategic partnerships with great world powers - China, the United States of\n America, and Russia. However, the accession process to the EU requires from\n Serbia to strictly follow its obligations from the Stabilization and\n Association Agreement, Treaty Establishing the Transport Community, and\n other treaties signed with the EU which might sometimes conflict with\n project activities from the Belt and Road partnership process. These\n obligations relate mostly to competition and environmental protection. The\n author gives the analysis of the main points of possible conflict and\n indicates a double standard in the EU approach to the Belt and Road\n initiative. Then he presents arguments that indicate the Belt and Road can\n serve as a bridge between candidate countries and the EU internal market.\n The author concludes that although there exist some structural\n justifications to EU?s skepticism towards the Belt and Road, the best way to\n overcome them is to insist on political dialogue on many existing levels\n between the EU and China, with the aim to exchange information between them\n on EU rules, policies and standards to make sure Chinese investments and\n other financial activities in Serbia are in accordance with its accession\n obligations.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"326 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2002337v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The topic of this article is the Serbian foreign policy between its main strategic aims - membership in the European Union, and cooperation with China in the framework of the Belt and Road initiative. Serbia bases its foreign policy upon four pillars - the accession process to the EU and three strategic partnerships with great world powers - China, the United States of America, and Russia. However, the accession process to the EU requires from Serbia to strictly follow its obligations from the Stabilization and Association Agreement, Treaty Establishing the Transport Community, and other treaties signed with the EU which might sometimes conflict with project activities from the Belt and Road partnership process. These obligations relate mostly to competition and environmental protection. The author gives the analysis of the main points of possible conflict and indicates a double standard in the EU approach to the Belt and Road initiative. Then he presents arguments that indicate the Belt and Road can serve as a bridge between candidate countries and the EU internal market. The author concludes that although there exist some structural justifications to EU?s skepticism towards the Belt and Road, the best way to overcome them is to insist on political dialogue on many existing levels between the EU and China, with the aim to exchange information between them on EU rules, policies and standards to make sure Chinese investments and other financial activities in Serbia are in accordance with its accession obligations.
欧盟一体化与“一带一路”倡议:塞尔维亚的一个奇特案例
本文的主题是塞尔维亚的外交政策,其主要战略目标是加入欧盟,并在“一带一路”倡议的框架内与中国合作。塞尔维亚的外交政策基于四大支柱——加入欧盟的进程以及与世界大国——中国、美国和俄罗斯的三大战略伙伴关系。然而,加入欧盟的过程要求塞尔维亚严格遵守《稳定与联合协定》、《建立运输共同体条约》和其他与欧盟签署的条约中的义务,这些条约有时可能与“一带一路”伙伴关系进程中的项目活动相冲突。这些义务主要涉及竞争和环境保护。作者分析了可能出现的主要冲突点,并指出欧盟在“一带一路”倡议方面存在双重标准。然后,他提出的论点表明,“一带一路”可以作为候选国与欧盟内部市场之间的桥梁。作者的结论是,尽管存在一些结构性的理由,欧盟?尽管中国对“一带一路”持怀疑态度,但克服这种怀疑的最佳方式是坚持在欧盟和中国之间的许多现有层面进行政治对话,目的是在双方之间交换有关欧盟规则、政策和标准的信息,以确保中国在塞尔维亚的投资和其他金融活动符合其加入义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信