Trend Displays to Support Critical Care: A Systematic Review

Noa Segall, D. Borbolla, G. Fiol, Rosalie G. Waller, Thomas J. Reese, Paige Nesbitt, M. Wright
{"title":"Trend Displays to Support Critical Care: A Systematic Review","authors":"Noa Segall, D. Borbolla, G. Fiol, Rosalie G. Waller, Thomas J. Reese, Paige Nesbitt, M. Wright","doi":"10.1109/ICHI.2017.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important aspect of designing information displays to support monitoring and decision-making in critical care is the representation of change of patient data over time. We systematically reviewed articles to identify novel alternatives to tabular and single variable plots of values over time to convey information about change in multiple related variables. Following screening of 5,119 articles, 28 met our inclusion criteria. They described 26 unique displays evaluated in 31 experiments. Methods for representing change varied widely. We classified these methods as enhanced graphical displays (enhanced plots of quantitative data over time), other displays (novel object and metaphoric displays), small multiples displays (multiple co-presented small graphic displays), and simple change indicator displays. Overall, findings support the value of an explicit display of trend information using many different approaches. Few studies directly compared different methods for displaying trend information in ways that would support broader conclusions about which approaches may be preferred for specific applications. The studies suggest that, for displaying patient data trends, it is feasible to develop electronic displays that will outperform both historical paper-based flowcharts and current electronic health record (EHR)-based tabular approaches. There is evidence to suggest that even minor improvements to current approaches such as the automatic presentation of simple line plots of trends on EHRs or the addition of simple graphical indicators of trend direction on patient monitors could lead to clinically meaningful improvements in diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.","PeriodicalId":263611,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHI.2017.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

An important aspect of designing information displays to support monitoring and decision-making in critical care is the representation of change of patient data over time. We systematically reviewed articles to identify novel alternatives to tabular and single variable plots of values over time to convey information about change in multiple related variables. Following screening of 5,119 articles, 28 met our inclusion criteria. They described 26 unique displays evaluated in 31 experiments. Methods for representing change varied widely. We classified these methods as enhanced graphical displays (enhanced plots of quantitative data over time), other displays (novel object and metaphoric displays), small multiples displays (multiple co-presented small graphic displays), and simple change indicator displays. Overall, findings support the value of an explicit display of trend information using many different approaches. Few studies directly compared different methods for displaying trend information in ways that would support broader conclusions about which approaches may be preferred for specific applications. The studies suggest that, for displaying patient data trends, it is feasible to develop electronic displays that will outperform both historical paper-based flowcharts and current electronic health record (EHR)-based tabular approaches. There is evidence to suggest that even minor improvements to current approaches such as the automatic presentation of simple line plots of trends on EHRs or the addition of simple graphical indicators of trend direction on patient monitors could lead to clinically meaningful improvements in diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.
支持重症监护的趋势显示:系统回顾
设计信息显示以支持重症监护的监测和决策的一个重要方面是表示患者数据随时间的变化。我们系统地回顾了一些文章,以确定表格和单变量随时间变化的值图的新替代方案,以传达有关多个相关变量变化的信息。在对5119篇文章进行筛选后,有28篇符合我们的纳入标准。他们在31次实验中描述了26种独特的显示方式。表示变化的方法千差万别。我们将这些方法分类为增强型图形显示(随时间推移的定量数据的增强图)、其他显示(新对象和隐喻显示)、小型多重显示(多个共同呈现的小型图形显示)和简单的变化指示器显示。总体而言,研究结果支持使用许多不同方法显式显示趋势信息的价值。很少有研究直接比较显示趋势信息的不同方法,以支持关于哪种方法可能更适合特定应用的更广泛结论。研究表明,为了显示患者数据趋势,开发电子显示器是可行的,它将优于历史上基于纸张的流程图和当前基于电子健康记录(EHR)的表格方法。有证据表明,即使是对现有方法的微小改进,如在电子病历上自动显示简单的趋势线形图,或在患者监护仪上增加趋势方向的简单图形指标,也可能导致诊断准确性和效率在临床上有意义的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信