Immunotoxicogenomics: A Systems Approach

R. Vandebriel, H. Loveren, K. Baken, J. Pennings
{"title":"Immunotoxicogenomics: A Systems Approach","authors":"R. Vandebriel, H. Loveren, K. Baken, J. Pennings","doi":"10.1002/9780470744307.GAT228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immunotoxicity can be defined as the adverse effects of toxicants on the immune system. Low-molecular-weight chemicals that are able to induce allergy can be divided into contact and respiratory sensitizers. These sensitizers differ not only in their relevant exposure routes and the clinical effects they can induce, but also in risk assessment. Various types of data suggest that the oxidative stress response pathway is the most significant one affected by contact sensitizer exposure. Less abundant, primarily toxicogenomics, data suggest that the PTEN pathway is the most significant pathway affected by respiratory sensitizer exposure. The chemical characteristics that determine whether a sensitizer is a contact or respiratory sensitizer are beginning to be understood. We hypothesize how the oxidative stress and PTEN pathways may result in the in vivo observations of preferential Th1 and Th2 responses by contact and respiratory sensitizers, respectively. While for contact sensitization risk assessment seems to be feasible, this prospect is still remote for respiratory sensitization, partly because a validated in vivo model and quantitative data are lacking. To be able to identify respiratory sensitizers, we propose to develop non-animal assays on the basis of human data. This proposition also holds for risk assessment of respiratory sensitization. We anticipate that development of non-animal assays as well as risk assessment will depend on a systems toxicology framework. \n \n \nKeywords: \n \nKeap1; \nNrf2; \nPTEN; \nrespiratory tract; \nrisk assessment; \ntoxicogenomics; \nsensitizer; \nskin; \noxidative stress","PeriodicalId":325382,"journal":{"name":"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470744307.GAT228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunotoxicity can be defined as the adverse effects of toxicants on the immune system. Low-molecular-weight chemicals that are able to induce allergy can be divided into contact and respiratory sensitizers. These sensitizers differ not only in their relevant exposure routes and the clinical effects they can induce, but also in risk assessment. Various types of data suggest that the oxidative stress response pathway is the most significant one affected by contact sensitizer exposure. Less abundant, primarily toxicogenomics, data suggest that the PTEN pathway is the most significant pathway affected by respiratory sensitizer exposure. The chemical characteristics that determine whether a sensitizer is a contact or respiratory sensitizer are beginning to be understood. We hypothesize how the oxidative stress and PTEN pathways may result in the in vivo observations of preferential Th1 and Th2 responses by contact and respiratory sensitizers, respectively. While for contact sensitization risk assessment seems to be feasible, this prospect is still remote for respiratory sensitization, partly because a validated in vivo model and quantitative data are lacking. To be able to identify respiratory sensitizers, we propose to develop non-animal assays on the basis of human data. This proposition also holds for risk assessment of respiratory sensitization. We anticipate that development of non-animal assays as well as risk assessment will depend on a systems toxicology framework. Keywords: Keap1; Nrf2; PTEN; respiratory tract; risk assessment; toxicogenomics; sensitizer; skin; oxidative stress
免疫毒性基因组学:系统方法
免疫毒性可以定义为有毒物质对免疫系统的不良影响。能引起过敏的低分子量化学物质可分为接触致敏剂和呼吸致敏剂。这些致敏物不仅在相关暴露途径和可诱发的临床效果上存在差异,而且在风险评估上也存在差异。各种类型的数据表明,氧化应激反应途径是接触致敏剂暴露影响最显著的途径。较少的,主要是毒物基因组学的数据表明,PTEN途径是受呼吸致敏剂暴露影响的最重要途径。决定敏化剂是接触性敏化剂还是呼吸性敏化剂的化学特性正在开始被了解。我们假设氧化应激和PTEN途径可能分别导致接触和呼吸致敏剂对Th1和Th2的优先反应。虽然接触致敏风险评估似乎是可行的,但呼吸道致敏的前景仍然遥远,部分原因是缺乏经过验证的体内模型和定量数据。为了能够识别呼吸道致敏物,我们建议在人类数据的基础上开发非动物试验。这一命题也适用于呼吸致敏的风险评估。我们预计,非动物分析和风险评估的发展将取决于系统毒理学框架。关键词:Keap1;Nrf2;PTEN;呼吸道;风险评估;toxicogenomics;敏化剂;皮肤;氧化应激
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信