Queering School Literacy Practices: Interventionist Approaches

L. Moita‐Lopes, Branca Falabella Fabrício
{"title":"Queering School Literacy Practices: Interventionist Approaches","authors":"L. Moita‐Lopes, Branca Falabella Fabrício","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews research into school literacy practices that suggest a way of discursively destabilizing frozen notions of sexuality. The review explores questions such as: How can school literacies collaborate with the reconfiguration of crystalized meanings about gender and sexuality performances? What kind of queer experiences can classroom talk promote? What are some of the meaning-effects produced by the circulation of gender and sexuality discourses in the classroom? The answers to these questions are organized in three groups: interventionist projects observed by a researcher; interventionist projects carried out and evaluated by a teacher-researcher; and projects involving teacher-researcher collaboration. The last group is explored by analyzing empirical data generated in a high school in Brazil. The underlying argument is that education may contribute to interrupting an essentialized order that defines and legitimates gender and sexuality. By putting sexuality issues at the front of the educational agenda, the interventionist research in literacy contexts reviewed in this chapter destabilizes both the gender divide and the so-called heteronormative matrix that play crucial roles in the ways we have historically learned to (1) understand ourselves and others; and (2) construct patterns of normalcy and deviance.","PeriodicalId":153363,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This chapter reviews research into school literacy practices that suggest a way of discursively destabilizing frozen notions of sexuality. The review explores questions such as: How can school literacies collaborate with the reconfiguration of crystalized meanings about gender and sexuality performances? What kind of queer experiences can classroom talk promote? What are some of the meaning-effects produced by the circulation of gender and sexuality discourses in the classroom? The answers to these questions are organized in three groups: interventionist projects observed by a researcher; interventionist projects carried out and evaluated by a teacher-researcher; and projects involving teacher-researcher collaboration. The last group is explored by analyzing empirical data generated in a high school in Brazil. The underlying argument is that education may contribute to interrupting an essentialized order that defines and legitimates gender and sexuality. By putting sexuality issues at the front of the educational agenda, the interventionist research in literacy contexts reviewed in this chapter destabilizes both the gender divide and the so-called heteronormative matrix that play crucial roles in the ways we have historically learned to (1) understand ourselves and others; and (2) construct patterns of normalcy and deviance.
酷儿学校扫盲实践:干预主义方法
本章回顾了对学校扫盲实践的研究,这些研究提出了一种话语不稳定性观念的方法。这篇评论探讨了以下问题:学校文化如何与重新配置关于性别和性行为的明确意义合作?课堂谈话能促进什么样的酷儿体验?性别和性话语在课堂上的循环产生了哪些意义效应?这些问题的答案被分为三组:由研究人员观察的干预主义项目;由一名教师兼研究员执行和评估的干预项目;以及涉及教师与研究人员合作的项目。最后一组是通过分析在巴西一所高中产生的实证数据来探索的。潜在的论点是,教育可能有助于打断定义性别和性行为并使其合法化的本质秩序。通过将性问题置于教育议程的前沿,本章回顾的读写能力背景下的干预主义研究破坏了性别鸿沟和所谓的异性规范矩阵的稳定,它们在我们历史上学习的方式中起着至关重要的作用:(1)理解自己和他人;(2)构建正常和异常模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信