Comparative analysis of adiabatic logics in sub-threshold regime for ultra-low power application

M. Chanda, Jeet Basak, Diptansu Sinha, Tanushree Ganguli, C. Sarkar
{"title":"Comparative analysis of adiabatic logics in sub-threshold regime for ultra-low power application","authors":"M. Chanda, Jeet Basak, Diptansu Sinha, Tanushree Ganguli, C. Sarkar","doi":"10.1109/ICEDSS.2016.7587690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In super-threshold regime, a plethora of adiabatic logic styles are reported for ultra-low power design. In this paper a comparative analysis of transistor based imperative logic styles are analyzed in the sub-threshold regime for the first time in the literature. A uniform test bench is set up for fair comparison. Extensive CADENCE simulations were done using 22nm technology file to analyze the effect of loading, temperature and the supply voltage on power dissipations of the logic styles in sub-threshold regime. Significant differences in workability, power consumption, and logic degradation were found among the various logic styles. Simulation shows that efficient charge recovery logic (ECRL) is efficacious amongst the transistor based adiabatic logic styles in sub-threshold regime.","PeriodicalId":399107,"journal":{"name":"2016 Conference on Emerging Devices and Smart Systems (ICEDSS)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Conference on Emerging Devices and Smart Systems (ICEDSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDSS.2016.7587690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In super-threshold regime, a plethora of adiabatic logic styles are reported for ultra-low power design. In this paper a comparative analysis of transistor based imperative logic styles are analyzed in the sub-threshold regime for the first time in the literature. A uniform test bench is set up for fair comparison. Extensive CADENCE simulations were done using 22nm technology file to analyze the effect of loading, temperature and the supply voltage on power dissipations of the logic styles in sub-threshold regime. Significant differences in workability, power consumption, and logic degradation were found among the various logic styles. Simulation shows that efficient charge recovery logic (ECRL) is efficacious amongst the transistor based adiabatic logic styles in sub-threshold regime.
超低功耗应用中亚阈值状态下绝热逻辑的比较分析
在超阈值条件下,大量绝热逻辑样式被报道用于超低功耗设计。本文首次对基于晶体管的命令式逻辑样式在亚阈值范围内进行了比较分析。为了公平比较,设置了统一的试验台。采用22nm技术文件进行了大量的CADENCE仿真,分析了负载、温度和电源电压对亚阈值状态下逻辑样式功耗的影响。不同的逻辑风格在可操作性、功耗和逻辑退化方面存在显著差异。仿真结果表明,有效的电荷恢复逻辑(ECRL)是亚阈值条件下基于晶体管的绝热逻辑的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信