International Arbitration

Horatia Muir Watt
{"title":"International Arbitration","authors":"Horatia Muir Watt","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses international arbitration as a crucial part of the\n legal framework that has progressively enabled the contemporary\n neo-liberal orientation of global governance. As such, it presents the\n perspective of critical private international law. If the latter\n discipline constitutes a significant viewpoint in this respect, it is\n precisely because it provided the foundational legal tools and discourse\n by means of which international arbitration attained such astounding\n success as a cornerstone of cross-border trade and investment regimes.\n The specific contention here is that in sanctifying freedom of contract\n to an unprecedented degree, including unrestricted party choice of law\n and forum, it has deactivated the regulatory constraints to which\n private actors are subject in a domestic setting and, involuntarily\n thereby, sealed the ‘loss of control’ by nation-states of various\n crucial aspects of the global economy. The chapter then explores the\n grievances generally addressed to arbitration as emblematic of the\n privatization of global governance, understood alternatively as a\n confiscation of power in the hands of a happy few individuals or as the\n subordination of public concerns to private interests.","PeriodicalId":448349,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration","volume":"240 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses international arbitration as a crucial part of the legal framework that has progressively enabled the contemporary neo-liberal orientation of global governance. As such, it presents the perspective of critical private international law. If the latter discipline constitutes a significant viewpoint in this respect, it is precisely because it provided the foundational legal tools and discourse by means of which international arbitration attained such astounding success as a cornerstone of cross-border trade and investment regimes. The specific contention here is that in sanctifying freedom of contract to an unprecedented degree, including unrestricted party choice of law and forum, it has deactivated the regulatory constraints to which private actors are subject in a domestic setting and, involuntarily thereby, sealed the ‘loss of control’ by nation-states of various crucial aspects of the global economy. The chapter then explores the grievances generally addressed to arbitration as emblematic of the privatization of global governance, understood alternatively as a confiscation of power in the hands of a happy few individuals or as the subordination of public concerns to private interests.
国际仲裁
本章讨论国际仲裁作为法律框架的一个重要组成部分,它逐渐使当代全球治理的新自由主义取向成为可能。因此,它呈现了批判性国际私法的视角。如果说后一门学科在这方面构成了一个重要的观点,那正是因为它提供了基本的法律工具和话语,使国际仲裁作为跨境贸易和投资制度的基石获得了如此惊人的成功。这里的具体论点是,在将契约自由神圣化到前所未有的程度,包括不受限制的当事人对法律和论坛的选择,它已经使私人行为者在国内环境中受到的监管约束失效,从而不由自主地封锁了民族国家对全球经济各个关键方面的“失去控制”。然后,本章探讨了通常向仲裁提出的不满,作为全球治理私有化的象征,可以理解为少数幸福的个人手中的权力没收,或者将公共关切从属于私人利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信