Animal as Text, Text as Animal: On the Matter of Textuality

Rodolfo Piskorski
{"title":"Animal as Text, Text as Animal: On the Matter of Textuality","authors":"Rodolfo Piskorski","doi":"10.14361/9783839428733-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Piskorski situates the common analytical strategy in Literary Animal Studies of foregrounding animal embodiment in J. M. Coetzee’s The Lives of Animals, underscoring such a strategy’s inadvertent admission of the constitutive powers of language in literature’s attempt to grapple with embodiment. Next, he discusses in more detail the co-implicated character of language and materiality and offers a critique of some interventions in Animal Studies and their reliance on a thinking of the body. The discussion then focuses on Derrida by revisiting his early writings on Husserl where he exposes the similarities between language and animality, and concludes by discussing how Derrida’s deconstruction of the linguistic sign and introduction of the trace opens a space for thinking the animal differently.","PeriodicalId":132102,"journal":{"name":"Derrida and Textual Animality","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derrida and Textual Animality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839428733-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Piskorski situates the common analytical strategy in Literary Animal Studies of foregrounding animal embodiment in J. M. Coetzee’s The Lives of Animals, underscoring such a strategy’s inadvertent admission of the constitutive powers of language in literature’s attempt to grapple with embodiment. Next, he discusses in more detail the co-implicated character of language and materiality and offers a critique of some interventions in Animal Studies and their reliance on a thinking of the body. The discussion then focuses on Derrida by revisiting his early writings on Husserl where he exposes the similarities between language and animality, and concludes by discussing how Derrida’s deconstruction of the linguistic sign and introduction of the trace opens a space for thinking the animal differently.
动物即文本,文本即动物:论文本性问题
皮斯科尔斯基将文学动物研究中常见的分析策略置于j.m.库切的《动物的生活》中,强调这种策略无意中承认了文学试图与体现作斗争时语言的构成力量。接下来,他更详细地讨论了语言和物质性的共同牵连特征,并对动物研究中的一些干预及其对身体思维的依赖提出了批评。然后讨论集中在德里达,通过回顾他早期关于胡塞尔的著作,他揭露了语言和动物之间的相似之处,最后讨论德里达对语言符号的解构和对痕迹的引入,如何为动物的不同思考开辟了空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信