Improving Fairness in Adaptive Social Exergames via Shapley Bandits

Robert C. Gray, Jennifer Villareale, Thomas Fox, Diane H Dallal, Santiago Ontan'on, D. Arigo, S. Jabbari, Jichen Zhu
{"title":"Improving Fairness in Adaptive Social Exergames via Shapley Bandits","authors":"Robert C. Gray, Jennifer Villareale, Thomas Fox, Diane H Dallal, Santiago Ontan'on, D. Arigo, S. Jabbari, Jichen Zhu","doi":"10.1145/3581641.3584050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithmic fairness is an essential requirement as AI becomes integrated in society. In the case of social applications where AI distributes resources, algorithms often must make decisions that will benefit a subset of users, sometimes repeatedly or exclusively, while attempting to maximize specific outcomes. How should we design such systems to serve users more fairly? This paper explores this question in the case where a group of users works toward a shared goal in a social exergame called Step Heroes. We identify adverse outcomes in traditional multi-armed bandits (MABs) and formalize the Greedy Bandit Problem. We then propose a solution based on a new type of fairness-aware multi-armed bandit, Shapley Bandits. It uses the Shapley Value for increasing overall player participation and intervention adherence rather than the maximization of total group output, which is traditionally achieved by favoring only high-performing participants. We evaluate our approach via a user study (n=46). Our results indicate that our Shapley Bandits effectively mediates the Greedy Bandit Problem and achieves better user retention and motivation across the participants.","PeriodicalId":118159,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3581641.3584050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Algorithmic fairness is an essential requirement as AI becomes integrated in society. In the case of social applications where AI distributes resources, algorithms often must make decisions that will benefit a subset of users, sometimes repeatedly or exclusively, while attempting to maximize specific outcomes. How should we design such systems to serve users more fairly? This paper explores this question in the case where a group of users works toward a shared goal in a social exergame called Step Heroes. We identify adverse outcomes in traditional multi-armed bandits (MABs) and formalize the Greedy Bandit Problem. We then propose a solution based on a new type of fairness-aware multi-armed bandit, Shapley Bandits. It uses the Shapley Value for increasing overall player participation and intervention adherence rather than the maximization of total group output, which is traditionally achieved by favoring only high-performing participants. We evaluate our approach via a user study (n=46). Our results indicate that our Shapley Bandits effectively mediates the Greedy Bandit Problem and achieves better user retention and motivation across the participants.
Shapley Bandits提高适应性社交游戏公平性
随着人工智能融入社会,算法公平性是一项基本要求。在人工智能分配资源的社交应用程序中,算法通常必须做出有利于一小部分用户的决策,有时是重复的或单独的,同时试图最大化特定结果。我们应该如何设计这样的系统来更公平地为用户服务?本文以一款名为《Step Heroes》的社交游戏中的一群用户为实现共同目标而努力为例来探讨这个问题。我们确定了传统多武装土匪(mab)的不良后果,并形式化了贪婪土匪问题。然后,我们提出了一种基于新型公平意识的多臂强盗Shapley匪徒的解决方案。它使用Shapley值来增加整体参与者的参与和干预依从性,而不是最大化总团队产出,这是传统上只支持高绩效参与者来实现的。我们通过一项用户研究(n=46)来评估我们的方法。我们的研究结果表明,我们的Shapley土匪有效地调解了贪婪土匪问题,并在参与者中获得了更好的用户留存率和动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信