THE FORMATION OF THE IMAGE OF THE VICTORIAN NOVEL IN THE “VESTNIK EVROPY” (1870S)

E. Samorodnitskaya
{"title":"THE FORMATION OF THE IMAGE OF THE VICTORIAN NOVEL IN THE “VESTNIK EVROPY” (1870S)","authors":"E. Samorodnitskaya","doi":"10.28995/2686-7249-2021-10-187-198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the formation of the image of the Victorian novel in the journal “Vestnik Evropy” of the 1870s on the basis of critical responses to current publications. The magazine presents a fairly representative picture of modern English literature, covering both the writers of the “first” literary row (A. Trollope, G. Eliot), and the authors of popular fiction (W. Collins, M. Braddon, R. Boughton, etc.). Critical reviews often show a certain subjectivity (A.-A. Renyard), but, as a rule, they are characterized by an attempt to comprehensively describe the modern novel as a phenomenon. It is considered and evaluated from the point of view of compliance with the principles of realistic poetics with attention to social issues. Not surprisingly, the preference is given to A. Trollope and G. Eliot, while the “sensational” novel causes difficulties: critics either put it low because of its focus on external entertainment (L.A. Polonsky), or try to find worthy features in it, such as an interest in acute social issues (N.A. Tal’). The author of the article comes to the conclusion that literary criticism notices the complexity and heterogeneity of the Victorian novel (without using such a notion), but when analyzing it, he rather tries to fit the phenomenon under consideration into a predetermined paradigm, which can not but lead to simplification.","PeriodicalId":124543,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\" Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\" Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-10-187-198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the formation of the image of the Victorian novel in the journal “Vestnik Evropy” of the 1870s on the basis of critical responses to current publications. The magazine presents a fairly representative picture of modern English literature, covering both the writers of the “first” literary row (A. Trollope, G. Eliot), and the authors of popular fiction (W. Collins, M. Braddon, R. Boughton, etc.). Critical reviews often show a certain subjectivity (A.-A. Renyard), but, as a rule, they are characterized by an attempt to comprehensively describe the modern novel as a phenomenon. It is considered and evaluated from the point of view of compliance with the principles of realistic poetics with attention to social issues. Not surprisingly, the preference is given to A. Trollope and G. Eliot, while the “sensational” novel causes difficulties: critics either put it low because of its focus on external entertainment (L.A. Polonsky), or try to find worthy features in it, such as an interest in acute social issues (N.A. Tal’). The author of the article comes to the conclusion that literary criticism notices the complexity and heterogeneity of the Victorian novel (without using such a notion), but when analyzing it, he rather tries to fit the phenomenon under consideration into a predetermined paradigm, which can not but lead to simplification.
《vestnik evropy》(19世纪70年代)中维多利亚时代小说形象的形成
本文在对当时出版物的评论反应的基础上,考察了19世纪70年代《Vestnik Evropy》杂志上维多利亚时代小说形象的形成。这本杂志呈现了一幅相当有代表性的现代英国文学的图画,既包括“第一”文学作家(a .特罗洛普、G.艾略特),也包括通俗小说作家(W.柯林斯、M.布雷登、R.鲍顿等)。批评性评论往往表现出一定的主观性。Renyard),但是,作为一个规则,他们的特点是试图全面地描述现代小说作为一种现象。从符合现实主义诗学原则,关注社会问题的角度来思考和评价它。毫不奇怪,特罗洛普(A. Trollope)和艾略特(G. Eliot)受到了青睐,而“耸人听闻”的小说也带来了困难:评论家要么因为它关注外部娱乐(L.A. Polonsky)而把它放低,要么试图在其中找到有价值的特征,比如对尖锐社会问题的兴趣(N.A. Tal)。本文的结论是,文学批评注意到维多利亚时代小说的复杂性和异质性(没有使用这种概念),但在分析它的时候,他更倾向于将所考虑的现象放入一个预定的范式中,这只能导致简单化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信