Production and Depletion

J. Leonard
{"title":"Production and Depletion","authors":"J. Leonard","doi":"10.1017/9781316091869.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Marvin Harris, a Columbia University Anthropologist . . . we have been going downhill since the Stone Age. Paleolithic man (and woman) got along fine on a combination of animal protein and infanticide, working just three or four hours a day. When at the end of the Pleistocene Epoch, the \"megafauna\" disappeared, not even an infanticide rate as high as 50 per cent could maintain an adequate diet for all the available people.\n And so we turned from animal to plant protein; from a \"mode of production\" that was primarily hunting to one primarily agricultural; from roving bands to settled villages, then cities and states. Agriculture is more \"labor efficient\" than hunting. But the trouble with efficiency we're told is that as it intensifies production it also speeds up depletion of resources. Producing and reproducing we overpopulate our space and use up its capacity to sustain us. Then we go off to war with neighboring villages, and back to infanticide at home, while waiting for a new mode of production to suggest itself, which mode will in its turn, intensify and deplete.","PeriodicalId":296808,"journal":{"name":"Unconventional Reservoir Geomechanics","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unconventional Reservoir Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091869.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

According to Marvin Harris, a Columbia University Anthropologist . . . we have been going downhill since the Stone Age. Paleolithic man (and woman) got along fine on a combination of animal protein and infanticide, working just three or four hours a day. When at the end of the Pleistocene Epoch, the "megafauna" disappeared, not even an infanticide rate as high as 50 per cent could maintain an adequate diet for all the available people. And so we turned from animal to plant protein; from a "mode of production" that was primarily hunting to one primarily agricultural; from roving bands to settled villages, then cities and states. Agriculture is more "labor efficient" than hunting. But the trouble with efficiency we're told is that as it intensifies production it also speeds up depletion of resources. Producing and reproducing we overpopulate our space and use up its capacity to sustain us. Then we go off to war with neighboring villages, and back to infanticide at home, while waiting for a new mode of production to suggest itself, which mode will in its turn, intensify and deplete.
生产和消耗
根据哥伦比亚大学人类学家马文·哈里斯的说法…自石器时代以来,我们一直在走下坡路。旧石器时代的男人(和女人)靠吃动物蛋白和杀婴为生,每天只工作三到四个小时。在更新世末期,“巨型动物”消失了,即使杀婴率高达50%,也无法为所有可用的人维持足够的饮食。于是我们从动物蛋白转向植物蛋白;从以狩猎为主的“生产方式”到以农业为主的“生产方式”;从流浪乐队到定居村庄,然后是城市和州。农业比狩猎更具“劳动效率”。但我们被告知,效率的问题在于,它在强化生产的同时,也加速了资源的枯竭。生产和再生产使我们的空间人满为患,耗尽了它维持我们生存的能力。然后,我们与邻近的村庄开战,回到家里杀婴,等待一种新的生产方式出现,而这种生产方式将反过来加强和消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信