{"title":"Computation time analysis of centralized and distributed optimization algorithms applied to automated irrigation networks","authors":"A. Farhadi, P. Dower, M. Cantoni","doi":"10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the computation time of two algorithms for solving a structured constrained linear optimal control problem with finite horizon quadratic cost within the context of automated irrigation networks. The first is a standard centralized algorithm based on the active set method that does not exploit problem structure. The second is distributed and is based on a consensus algorithm, not specifically tailored to account for system structure. It is shown that there is a significant advantage in terms of computation overhead (the time spent computing the optimal solution) in using the second algorithm in large-scale networks. Specifically, for a fixed horizon length the computation overhead of the centralized algorithm grows as O(n5) with the number n of sub-systems. By contrast, it is observed via a combination of analysis and experiment that given n times resources for computation the computation overhead of the distributed algorithm grows as O(n) with the number n of sub-systems.","PeriodicalId":177490,"journal":{"name":"2013 Australian Control Conference","volume":"689 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Australian Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
This paper compares the computation time of two algorithms for solving a structured constrained linear optimal control problem with finite horizon quadratic cost within the context of automated irrigation networks. The first is a standard centralized algorithm based on the active set method that does not exploit problem structure. The second is distributed and is based on a consensus algorithm, not specifically tailored to account for system structure. It is shown that there is a significant advantage in terms of computation overhead (the time spent computing the optimal solution) in using the second algorithm in large-scale networks. Specifically, for a fixed horizon length the computation overhead of the centralized algorithm grows as O(n5) with the number n of sub-systems. By contrast, it is observed via a combination of analysis and experiment that given n times resources for computation the computation overhead of the distributed algorithm grows as O(n) with the number n of sub-systems.