Evaluation of Lung Cell Toxicity of Surfactants for Inhalation Route

F. Lindenberg, F. Sichel, M. Lechevrel, R. Respaud, G. Saint-Lorant
{"title":"Evaluation of Lung Cell Toxicity of Surfactants for Inhalation Route","authors":"F. Lindenberg, F. Sichel, M. Lechevrel, R. Respaud, G. Saint-Lorant","doi":"10.23937/2572-4061.1510022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few data are available for excipients administered by inhalation route. This study evaluated the in vitro potential toxicity of three surfactants (Polysorbate 20, Polysorbate 80 and Poloxamer 188) by using an original air-liquid interface (ALI) method of exposure compared to liquid/liquid (L/L) model. Two cell toxicity tests were conducted on BE-AS-2B cells, a human immortalized bronchial epithelial cell lines; measurement of Lactate Dehydrogenase activity and XTT cell proliferation assay. We found that Polysorbate 20 appeared to be more toxic than Polysorbate 80, Poloxamer 188. An increased toxicity of Polysorbate 20 in L/L system as shown in comparison to ALI exposure. A toxicity was also observed for polysorbate 80 but at higher concentrations and without difference between L/L and ALI exposure. No toxicity was observed for Poloxamer 188 at high concentrations. Poloxamer 188 seems to be the better candidate, out of the three tested, for galenic formulations designed to the inhalation route such as biotherapies. To evaluate the cytotoxicity of excipients for inhalation route the ALI exposure have to be used instead of L/L.","PeriodicalId":174677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Risk Assessment","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-4061.1510022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Few data are available for excipients administered by inhalation route. This study evaluated the in vitro potential toxicity of three surfactants (Polysorbate 20, Polysorbate 80 and Poloxamer 188) by using an original air-liquid interface (ALI) method of exposure compared to liquid/liquid (L/L) model. Two cell toxicity tests were conducted on BE-AS-2B cells, a human immortalized bronchial epithelial cell lines; measurement of Lactate Dehydrogenase activity and XTT cell proliferation assay. We found that Polysorbate 20 appeared to be more toxic than Polysorbate 80, Poloxamer 188. An increased toxicity of Polysorbate 20 in L/L system as shown in comparison to ALI exposure. A toxicity was also observed for polysorbate 80 but at higher concentrations and without difference between L/L and ALI exposure. No toxicity was observed for Poloxamer 188 at high concentrations. Poloxamer 188 seems to be the better candidate, out of the three tested, for galenic formulations designed to the inhalation route such as biotherapies. To evaluate the cytotoxicity of excipients for inhalation route the ALI exposure have to be used instead of L/L.
吸入途径表面活性剂的肺细胞毒性评价
很少有关于吸入方式给药的辅料的资料。本研究采用原始气液界面(ALI)暴露法与液/液(L/L)模型比较,评价了三种表面活性剂(聚山梨酯20、聚山梨酯80和Poloxamer 188)的体外潜在毒性。对人支气管上皮永生化细胞系BE-AS-2B细胞进行了两项细胞毒性试验;乳酸脱氢酶活性测定及XTT细胞增殖试验。我们发现聚山梨酯20似乎比聚山梨酯80和波洛沙姆188的毒性更大。聚山梨酸酯20在L/L系统中的毒性与ALI暴露相比有所增加。聚山梨酸80也有毒性,但浓度较高,暴露在L/L和ALI之间没有差异。波洛沙姆188在高浓度下未见毒性。在三种测试中,Poloxamer 188似乎是设计用于吸入途径(如生物疗法)的galenic配方的更好的候选者。为了评估吸入途径的赋形剂的细胞毒性,必须使用ALI暴露量而不是L/L。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信