Who Are the Good Team Players?

R. Bannerot
{"title":"Who Are the Good Team Players?","authors":"R. Bannerot","doi":"10.18260/1-2-620-38467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Working in teams, especially on multidisciplinary projects, is becoming more and more common in engineering as well as in other work environments. However, despite the importance of “team-work” in engineering design, there is little data on the characteristics of “good” and “poor” team players. This paper presents preliminary results from an ongoing, horizontal study of this issue in two engineering design courses, one at the sophomore level and the other at the senior level. Individual demographic, academic, personality (Myers-Briggs type indicators) and personal data, as well as interest and skill level, were gathered for the entire class. The data for those individuals judged to be above average team players and those judged to be below average team players were then compared. Some of the conclusions reached are listed below: • The women tended to be better team players than the men. • The better team players tended to be older, with more work and hands-on experience and either Caucasian or Hispanic. • The better team players tended to have higher college and high school GPAs and higher SAT Verbal scores but lower SAT Analytical scores. • The better team players tended to have better drawing abilities and, perhaps most important of all, were better self-critics of their own drawing abilities. As a result of these conclusions several specific recommendation are made which may improve the ability of some students to work more effectively in groups. However, these conclusions and recommendations are based on very limited data, and further study is needed.","PeriodicalId":355306,"journal":{"name":"2003 GSW Proceedings","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 GSW Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-620-38467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Working in teams, especially on multidisciplinary projects, is becoming more and more common in engineering as well as in other work environments. However, despite the importance of “team-work” in engineering design, there is little data on the characteristics of “good” and “poor” team players. This paper presents preliminary results from an ongoing, horizontal study of this issue in two engineering design courses, one at the sophomore level and the other at the senior level. Individual demographic, academic, personality (Myers-Briggs type indicators) and personal data, as well as interest and skill level, were gathered for the entire class. The data for those individuals judged to be above average team players and those judged to be below average team players were then compared. Some of the conclusions reached are listed below: • The women tended to be better team players than the men. • The better team players tended to be older, with more work and hands-on experience and either Caucasian or Hispanic. • The better team players tended to have higher college and high school GPAs and higher SAT Verbal scores but lower SAT Analytical scores. • The better team players tended to have better drawing abilities and, perhaps most important of all, were better self-critics of their own drawing abilities. As a result of these conclusions several specific recommendation are made which may improve the ability of some students to work more effectively in groups. However, these conclusions and recommendations are based on very limited data, and further study is needed.
谁是优秀的团队合作者?
在团队中工作,特别是在多学科项目中,在工程以及其他工作环境中变得越来越普遍。然而,尽管“团队合作”在工程设计中很重要,但关于“好”和“差”团队成员特征的数据却很少。本文介绍了在两门工程设计课程中对这个问题进行的横向研究的初步结果,一门是在大二阶段,另一门是在大四阶段。整个班级都收集了个人人口统计、学术、个性(迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标)和个人数据,以及兴趣和技能水平。然后比较了那些被认为是高于平均水平的团队成员和被认为是低于平均水平的团队成员的数据。得出的一些结论如下:•女性往往比男性更善于团队合作。•更好的团队合作者往往年龄较大,有更多的工作和实践经验,要么是白人,要么是西班牙裔。•团队合作能力较强的人在大学和高中的gpa和SAT语言成绩较高,但SAT分析成绩较低。•更好的团队成员往往有更好的绘画能力,也许最重要的是,他们对自己的绘画能力有更好的自我批评。由于这些结论,提出了一些具体的建议,这些建议可能会提高一些学生在小组中更有效地工作的能力。然而,这些结论和建议是基于非常有限的数据,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信