Mass Housing Estates in Csepel, Budapest: Urban Form Evaluation in Relation to Sustainability

Hlib Antypenko, M. Benkő
{"title":"Mass Housing Estates in Csepel, Budapest: Urban Form Evaluation in Relation to Sustainability","authors":"Hlib Antypenko, M. Benkő","doi":"10.18485/arh_pt.2020.7.ch3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mass housing is a global urban phenomenon, whilst in the Central and Eastern European countries the majority of these neighborhoods were constructed during the socialist period. The research focuses on the city of Csepel, former industrial town, since 1950 the 21 st district of Budapest. Budapest is one of the Hungarian cities with a very high mass housing ratio, more than two-third of its population lives there. The paper compares five housing developments in Csepel - three of them were awarded on a national level at the time of their construction. Situated next to the main axis of Csepel - Béke téri, a modern housing estate from the end of 40s; Rakéta utcai, an awarded modern housing estate from the end of 50s; Ady út large prefabricated housing estate with 10 story high slabs from the end of 60s; Simon Bolivár Estate, an awarded large prefabricated housing estate from the end of 70s; and Rákóczi úti - one of the rare social housing developments from 2000s in Hungary. The urban position of these neighborhoods is similar, while the architectural and technical qualities of the buildings vary and is often subjected to the original construction problems or actual renewal policy issues. Taking into consideration that all these estates were planned as a single urban and development unit, its urban form and open space elements should be revaluated, seeking the perspectives for its adaptation to the contemporary urban and market demands. Comparison uses sustainability indicators related to physical environment such as: density, diversity, land use, green-ing, transportation, compactness et cetera to give a fair picture of the estates’ urban values and potentials. What are the architecture and urban qualities and weaknesses of these housing estates? How the urban form developed over time? How sustainable is the urban form of these estates? What can be done to boost its attractiveness to the citizens, architects, and developers?","PeriodicalId":337051,"journal":{"name":"International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/arh_pt.2020.7.ch3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mass housing is a global urban phenomenon, whilst in the Central and Eastern European countries the majority of these neighborhoods were constructed during the socialist period. The research focuses on the city of Csepel, former industrial town, since 1950 the 21 st district of Budapest. Budapest is one of the Hungarian cities with a very high mass housing ratio, more than two-third of its population lives there. The paper compares five housing developments in Csepel - three of them were awarded on a national level at the time of their construction. Situated next to the main axis of Csepel - Béke téri, a modern housing estate from the end of 40s; Rakéta utcai, an awarded modern housing estate from the end of 50s; Ady út large prefabricated housing estate with 10 story high slabs from the end of 60s; Simon Bolivár Estate, an awarded large prefabricated housing estate from the end of 70s; and Rákóczi úti - one of the rare social housing developments from 2000s in Hungary. The urban position of these neighborhoods is similar, while the architectural and technical qualities of the buildings vary and is often subjected to the original construction problems or actual renewal policy issues. Taking into consideration that all these estates were planned as a single urban and development unit, its urban form and open space elements should be revaluated, seeking the perspectives for its adaptation to the contemporary urban and market demands. Comparison uses sustainability indicators related to physical environment such as: density, diversity, land use, green-ing, transportation, compactness et cetera to give a fair picture of the estates’ urban values and potentials. What are the architecture and urban qualities and weaknesses of these housing estates? How the urban form developed over time? How sustainable is the urban form of these estates? What can be done to boost its attractiveness to the citizens, architects, and developers?
布达佩斯塞佩尔的大规模住宅区:与可持续性相关的城市形态评价
大规模住房是一种全球性的城市现象,而在中欧和东欧国家,这些社区中的大多数是在社会主义时期建造的。研究的重点是切佩尔市,前工业城镇,自1950年以来布达佩斯的第21区。布达佩斯是匈牙利人口住房比例非常高的城市之一,超过三分之二的人口居住在那里。这篇论文比较了佩尔的五个住房开发项目,其中三个在建造时就获得了国家一级的奖励。位于Csepel - bsamke tsamri的主轴旁边,这是一个40年代末的现代住宅区;rakta utcai,一个从50年代末开始被授予的现代住宅区;Ady út 60年代末10层高的大型预制住宅小区;Simon Bolivár Estate, 70年代末获奖的大型预制住宅小区;以及Rákóczi úti——匈牙利2000年代以来罕见的社会住房开发项目之一。这些社区的城市位置相似,但建筑的建筑和技术质量各不相同,往往受到原始建设问题或实际更新政策问题的影响。考虑到所有这些地产都是作为一个单一的城市和发展单元来规划的,它的城市形式和开放空间元素应该被重新评估,寻求适应当代城市和市场需求的视角。比较法使用与自然环境相关的可持续性指标,如密度、多样性、土地利用、绿化、交通、紧凑度等,以公平地反映房地产的城市价值和潜力。这些屋苑的建筑和城市品质及弱点是什么?城市形态是如何随着时间发展的?这些地产的城市形态可持续发展程度如何?怎样才能提高它对市民、建筑师和开发商的吸引力呢?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信